Dimitar Kuzmanov vs Paul Jubb — Glasgow CH Round of 32

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Dimitar Kuzmanov
BUL4
Dimitar Kuzmanov
#427ATP
1431ELO
1425Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 January 2026
hard
GBR
Paul Jubb
#331ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
Kuzmanov D.
6-2 6-3
Jubb P.
Kuzmanov D.
662
Jubb P.
230

Dimitar Kuzmanov defeated Paul Jubb 6-2 6-3 in the Glasgow CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kuzmanov D.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kuzmanov D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kuzmanov D.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
71%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
41%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.8
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.1
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kuzmanov D.Jubb P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
16
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
84
Break points won·Dominant
31
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kuzmanov D.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Jubb P.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+21 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1403
5.3Overall Elo 1431
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1426
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
3.3
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.7
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kuzmanov D.Jubb P.
Freshness·Dominant
72
100

Kuzmanov D.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 55 games (7d) · Jubb P.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Chidekh C.[2]
Kukushkin M.
5-76-14-0
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.
Barton H.
6-47-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Gombos N.
6-36-786-4
Quarter-finals
Barton H.
Monday J.[1]
7-626-3
Chidekh C.[2]
Broom C.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Gentzsch T.
6-26-4
Gombos N.
Broady L.
6-23-66-1
R16
Monday J.[1]
Gray A.
7-637-63
Kukushkin M.
Bertola R.[3]
6-16-2
Gentzsch T.
Moeller M.
7-56-2
Barton H.
Yevseyev D.
6-26-2
Chidekh C.[2]
Masur D.
7-655-77-60
Gombos N.
Wendelken H.
6-37-65
Broady L.
Kuzmanov D.[4]
7-636-766-2
Broom C.
Squire H.[8]
6-47-66
R32
Bertola R.[3]
Kopp S.
4-66-37-62
Kukushkin M.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-27-65
Moeller M.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-31-0
Gombos N.
Butvilas E.[7]
7-53-66-3
Masur D.
Karol M.
7-697-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Searle H.
7-676-4
Yevseyev D.
Pereira T.[6]
6-46-2
Gentzsch T.
Overbeck C.
7-626-2
Monday J.[1]
Krumich M.
6-36-736-3
Gray A.
Hussey G.
6-36-4
Wendelken H.
Kozlov S.
6-13-66-4
Broady L.
Damas M.
6-06-0
Kuzmanov D.[4]
Jubb P.
6-26-3
Squire H.[8]
Maxted L.
6-13-66-3
Broom C.
Negritu C.
6-736-47-63
Barton H.
Erhard M.
7-6126-2