Charles Broom vs Christoph Negritu — Glasgow CH Round of 32

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Charles Broom
#285ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 January 2026
hard
Christoph Negritu
GER
Christoph Negritu
#489ATP
1459ELO
1423Hard ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWWL
Broom C.
6-7 6-4 7-6
Negritu C.
Broom C.
636772
Negritu C.
774631

Charles Broom defeated Christoph Negritu 6-7 6-4 7-6 in the Glasgow CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Broom C.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Negritu C.

Negritu C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Serve advantage — Broom C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Broom C.Negritu C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.8
6.1
Double faults / match·Even
1.5
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (17 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broom C.Negritu C.
Clutch Rating·Even
12
16
Break points saved·Clear edge
56
78
Break points won·Even
0
0
Deciding sets·Clear edge
42
26
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
10
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Broom C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Negritu C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.9Hard Elo 1396
Surface ELO
5.1+27 Hard Elo edge
4.9Overall Elo 1409
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1459
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
3.7
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Chidekh C.[2]
Kukushkin M.
5-76-14-0
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.
Barton H.
6-47-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Gombos N.
6-36-786-4
Quarter-finals
Barton H.
Monday J.[1]
7-626-3
Chidekh C.[2]
Broom C.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Gentzsch T.
6-26-4
Gombos N.
Broady L.
6-23-66-1
R16
Monday J.[1]
Gray A.
7-637-63
Kukushkin M.
Bertola R.[3]
6-16-2
Gentzsch T.
Moeller M.
7-56-2
Barton H.
Yevseyev D.
6-26-2
Chidekh C.[2]
Masur D.
7-655-77-60
Gombos N.
Wendelken H.
6-37-65
Broady L.
Kuzmanov D.[4]
7-636-766-2
Broom C.
Squire H.[8]
6-47-66
R32
Bertola R.[3]
Kopp S.
4-66-37-62
Kukushkin M.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-27-65
Moeller M.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-31-0
Gombos N.
Butvilas E.[7]
7-53-66-3
Masur D.
Karol M.
7-697-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Searle H.
7-676-4
Yevseyev D.
Pereira T.[6]
6-46-2
Gentzsch T.
Overbeck C.
7-626-2
Monday J.[1]
Krumich M.
6-36-736-3
Gray A.
Hussey G.
6-36-4
Wendelken H.
Kozlov S.
6-13-66-4
Broady L.
Damas M.
6-06-0
Kuzmanov D.[4]
Jubb P.
6-26-3
Squire H.[8]
Maxted L.
6-13-66-3
Broom C.
Negritu C.
6-736-47-63
Barton H.
Erhard M.
7-6126-2