Norbert Gombos vs Liam Broady — Glasgow CH Quarter-final

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Norbert Gombos
SVK
Norbert Gombos
#364ATP
1472ELO
1452Hard ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 January 2026
hard
Liam Broady
GBR
Liam Broady
#209ATP
1590ELO
1577Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLLWL
Gombos N.
6-2 3-6 6-1
Broady L.
Gombos N.
6362
Broady L.
2611

Norbert Gombos defeated Liam Broady 6-2 3-6 6-1 in the Glasgow CH quarter-final on hard. Norbert Gombos extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Norbert Gombos closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-03-05Indian Wells MastersQ1hardNorbert Gombos7-6(6) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Gombos N.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Broady L.

Broady L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Serve advantage — Broady L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gombos N.Broady L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
55%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
46%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (18 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gombos N.Broady L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
59
Break points saved·Even
83
86
Break points won·Clear edge
8
29
Deciding sets·Slight edge
70
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
39
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gombos N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Broady L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.3Hard Elo 1452
Surface ELO
6.7+125 Hard Elo edge
3.3Overall Elo 1472
ELO gap
6.7Overall Elo 1590
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
1.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
7.8
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gombos N.Broady L.
Freshness·Even
69
67

Gombos N.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 76 games (7d) · Broady L.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 66 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Chidekh C.[2]
Kukushkin M.
5-76-14-0
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.
Barton H.
6-47-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Gombos N.
6-36-786-4
Quarter-finals
Barton H.
Monday J.[1]
7-626-3
Chidekh C.[2]
Broom C.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Gentzsch T.
6-26-4
Gombos N.
Broady L.
6-23-66-1
R16
Monday J.[1]
Gray A.
7-637-63
Kukushkin M.
Bertola R.[3]
6-16-2
Gentzsch T.
Moeller M.
7-56-2
Barton H.
Yevseyev D.
6-26-2
Chidekh C.[2]
Masur D.
7-655-77-60
Gombos N.
Wendelken H.
6-37-65
Broady L.
Kuzmanov D.[4]
7-636-766-2
Broom C.
Squire H.[8]
6-47-66
R32
Bertola R.[3]
Kopp S.
4-66-37-62
Kukushkin M.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-27-65
Moeller M.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-31-0
Gombos N.
Butvilas E.[7]
7-53-66-3
Masur D.
Karol M.
7-697-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Searle H.
7-676-4
Yevseyev D.
Pereira T.[6]
6-46-2
Gentzsch T.
Overbeck C.
7-626-2
Monday J.[1]
Krumich M.
6-36-736-3
Gray A.
Hussey G.
6-36-4
Wendelken H.
Kozlov S.
6-13-66-4
Broady L.
Damas M.
6-06-0
Kuzmanov D.[4]
Jubb P.
6-26-3
Squire H.[8]
Maxted L.
6-13-66-3
Broom C.
Negritu C.
6-736-47-63
Barton H.
Erhard M.
7-6126-2