Tom Gentzsch vs Carl Emil Overbeck — Glasgow CH Round of 32

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Tom Gentzsch
#216ATP
1565ELO
1492Hard ELO
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 January 2026
hard
DEN
Carl Emil Overbeck
#430ATP
1293ELO
1271Hard ELO
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLW
Gentzsch T.
7-6 6-2
Overbeck C.
Gentzsch T.
7762
Overbeck C.
6220

Tom Gentzsch defeated Carl Emil Overbeck 7-6 6-2 in the Glasgow CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tom Gentzsch closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gentzsch T.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Overbeck C.

Overbeck C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gentzsch T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gentzsch T.Overbeck C.
1st serve in·Even
67%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Clear edge
70%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
7.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (30 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gentzsch T.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Overbeck C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.8+221 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Hard Elo 1271
8.4Overall Elo 1565
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1293
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
7.6
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
7.1
0.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gentzsch T.Overbeck C.
Freshness·
89
—

Gentzsch T.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Chidekh C.[2]
Kukushkin M.
5-76-14-0
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.
Barton H.
6-47-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Gombos N.
6-36-786-4
Quarter-finals
Barton H.
Monday J.[1]
7-626-3
Chidekh C.[2]
Broom C.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Gentzsch T.
6-26-4
Gombos N.
Broady L.
6-23-66-1
R16
Monday J.[1]
Gray A.
7-637-63
Kukushkin M.
Bertola R.[3]
6-16-2
Gentzsch T.
Moeller M.
7-56-2
Barton H.
Yevseyev D.
6-26-2
Chidekh C.[2]
Masur D.
7-655-77-60
Gombos N.
Wendelken H.
6-37-65
Broady L.
Kuzmanov D.[4]
7-636-766-2
Broom C.
Squire H.[8]
6-47-66
R32
Bertola R.[3]
Kopp S.
4-66-37-62
Kukushkin M.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-27-65
Moeller M.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-31-0
Gombos N.
Butvilas E.[7]
7-53-66-3
Masur D.
Karol M.
7-697-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Searle H.
7-676-4
Yevseyev D.
Pereira T.[6]
6-46-2
Gentzsch T.
Overbeck C.
7-626-2
Monday J.[1]
Krumich M.
6-36-736-3
Gray A.
Hussey G.
6-36-4
Wendelken H.
Kozlov S.
6-13-66-4
Broady L.
Damas M.
6-06-0
Kuzmanov D.[4]
Jubb P.
6-26-3
Squire H.[8]
Maxted L.
6-13-66-3
Broom C.
Negritu C.
6-736-47-63
Barton H.
Erhard M.
7-6126-2