Facundo Mena vs Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez — Bogota CH Round of 32

Bogota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 November 2025
clay
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
MEX3
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
#323ATP
1527ELO
1460Clay ELO
21 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWW
Mena F.
6-4 6-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Mena F.
662
Pacheco Mendez R.
430

Facundo Mena defeated Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez 6-4 6-3 in the Bogota CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez came in ranked #323, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Mena closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mena F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Pacheco Mendez R.

Pacheco Mendez R.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mena F.Pacheco Mendez R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
4.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (69 vs 74). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mena F.Pacheco Mendez R.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
9
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
57
81
Break points won·Even
7
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
28
22
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
10
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mena F.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Pacheco Mendez R.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Clay Elo 1406
Surface ELO
5.6+54 Clay Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1427
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1527
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.4
Surface form
1.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
2.1
Minutes 14d
8.0
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mena F.Pacheco Mendez R.
Freshness·Clear edge
70
87

Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d) · Pacheco Mendez R.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.
Sakamoto P.[7]
6-16-3
Mejia N.[2]
Gomez J.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Kypson P.
Casanova H.
3-67-647-5
Sakamoto P.[7]
Rodrigues P.
4-67-56-3
Mejia N.[2]
Mena F.
7-661-66-2
Gomez J.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-756-26-4
Quarter-finals
Kypson P.
Ejupovic E.
7-667-66
Rodrigues P.
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
6-46-3
Casanova H.
Kolar Z.
4-66-36-1
Sakamoto P.[7]
Barreiros Reyes M.
3-66-37-5
Ficovich J.[1]
Barrientos N.
6-26-2
Mena F.
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
6-26-4
Mejia N.[2]
Varillas J.
7-656-2
Gomez J.
Kozlov S.[8]
4-66-47-5
R16
Rodrigues P.
Mejia N.[1]
7-675-76-3
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
Rodriguez L.
6-36-2
Sakamoto P.[7]
Cid R.
2-66-46-2
Barreiros Reyes M.
Aboian L.
6-46-1
Ejupovic E.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
6-36-4
Casanova H.
Tobon M.
6-36-1
Barrientos N.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-4
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
Bertran P.
6-46-4
Mena F.
Mckennon M.
6-36-4
Varillas J.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
6-47-63
Mejia N.[2]
Martinez A.
6-36-2
Ficovich J.[1]
Mccormick T.
6-13-66-3
Gomez J.
Poling K.
5-76-36-2
Kozlov S.[8]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-46-4
R32
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
Monzon I.
6-26-1
Mejia N.[1]
Bertran P.
6-06-1
Barreiros Reyes M.
Gomez J.
6-36-4
Casanova H.
Alves M.[6]
2-67-627-5
Kypson P.
Olivo R.[8]
6-07-61
Sakamoto P.[7]
Price S.
6-36-4
Tobon M.
Nunez D.
3-66-27-63
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-46-757-66
Boscardin Dias P.
Ambrogi L.
6-47-63
Ejupovic E.
Soto M.[2]
7-636-4
Rodrigues P.
Roncadelli F.
6-27-5
Rodriguez L.
Kuzuhara B.
6-46-2
Kolar Z.
Sell K.[3]
6-33-66-1
Soriano Barrera A.
Heredia S.
5-76-46-0
Aboian L.
Mccormick T.
6-24-66-4
Cid R.
Pannu K.
6-27-65
Poling K.
Popko D.[4]
3-64-1
Ficovich J.[1]
Alves M.
6-43-66-3
Mccormick T.
Price S.
6-46-2
Gomez J.
Heredia S.
6-17-5
Bertran P.
Magadan A.
6-16-1
Mckennon M.
Dickerson R.
6-32-66-4
Mena F.
Pacheco Mendez R.[3]
6-46-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Linde Palacios S.
6-756-36-1
Martinez A.
Tobon M.
6-46-1
Mejia N.[2]
Gima S.
6-37-62
Hernandez Serrano J.
Johns G.[7]
7-646-2
Barrientos N.
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
3-66-26-4
Jorda Sanchis D.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-1
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
Martin D.
6-36-2
Varillas J.
Rodriguez L.
6-26-4
Kozlov S.[8]
Torres J.
6-04-66-3