Nicolas Mejia vs Facundo Mena — Bogota CH Semi-final

Bogota CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Nicolas Mejia
COL2
Nicolas Mejia
#133ATP
1477ELO
1488Clay ELO
$142kYTD
$524kCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 November 2025
clay
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Mejia N.
7-6 1-6 6-2
Mena F.
Mejia N.
78162
Mena F.
66621

Nicolas Mejia defeated Facundo Mena 7-6 1-6 6-2 in the Bogota CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Nicolas Mejia came in ranked #133, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Nicolas Mejia closed it out in three sets, 7–6 1–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mejia N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Mejia N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mejia N.Mena F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (96 vs 69). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mejia N.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
9
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
57
Break points won·Even
6
7
Deciding sets·Clear edge
40
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
38
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mejia N.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Mena F.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+82 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Clay Elo 1406
6.3Overall Elo 1477
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1427
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
6.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
2.1
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
8.5
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mejia N.Mena F.
Freshness·Clear edge
47
66

Mejia N.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 116 games (7d) · Mena F.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.
Sakamoto P.[7]
6-16-3
Mejia N.[2]
Gomez J.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Kypson P.
Casanova H.
3-67-647-5
Sakamoto P.[7]
Rodrigues P.
4-67-56-3
Mejia N.[2]
Mena F.
7-661-66-2
Gomez J.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-756-26-4
Quarter-finals
Kypson P.
Ejupovic E.
7-667-66
Rodrigues P.
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
6-46-3
Casanova H.
Kolar Z.
4-66-36-1
Sakamoto P.[7]
Barreiros Reyes M.
3-66-37-5
Ficovich J.[1]
Barrientos N.
6-26-2
Mena F.
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
6-26-4
Mejia N.[2]
Varillas J.
7-656-2
Gomez J.
Kozlov S.[8]
4-66-47-5
R16
Rodrigues P.
Mejia N.[1]
7-675-76-3
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
Rodriguez L.
6-36-2
Sakamoto P.[7]
Cid R.
2-66-46-2
Barreiros Reyes M.
Aboian L.
6-46-1
Ejupovic E.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
6-36-4
Casanova H.
Tobon M.
6-36-1
Barrientos N.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-4
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
Bertran P.
6-46-4
Mena F.
Mckennon M.
6-36-4
Varillas J.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
6-47-63
Mejia N.[2]
Martinez A.
6-36-2
Ficovich J.[1]
Mccormick T.
6-13-66-3
Gomez J.
Poling K.
5-76-36-2
Kozlov S.[8]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-46-4
R32
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
Monzon I.
6-26-1
Mejia N.[1]
Bertran P.
6-06-1
Barreiros Reyes M.
Gomez J.
6-36-4
Casanova H.
Alves M.[6]
2-67-627-5
Kypson P.
Olivo R.[8]
6-07-61
Sakamoto P.[7]
Price S.
6-36-4
Tobon M.
Nunez D.
3-66-27-63
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-46-757-66
Boscardin Dias P.
Ambrogi L.
6-47-63
Ejupovic E.
Soto M.[2]
7-636-4
Rodrigues P.
Roncadelli F.
6-27-5
Rodriguez L.
Kuzuhara B.
6-46-2
Kolar Z.
Sell K.[3]
6-33-66-1
Soriano Barrera A.
Heredia S.
5-76-46-0
Aboian L.
Mccormick T.
6-24-66-4
Cid R.
Pannu K.
6-27-65
Poling K.
Popko D.[4]
3-64-1
Ficovich J.[1]
Alves M.
6-43-66-3
Mccormick T.
Price S.
6-46-2
Gomez J.
Heredia S.
6-17-5
Bertran P.
Magadan A.
6-16-1
Mckennon M.
Dickerson R.
6-32-66-4
Mena F.
Pacheco Mendez R.[3]
6-46-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Linde Palacios S.
6-756-36-1
Martinez A.
Tobon M.
6-46-1
Mejia N.[2]
Gima S.
6-37-62
Hernandez Serrano J.
Johns G.[7]
7-646-2
Barrientos N.
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
3-66-26-4
Jorda Sanchis D.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-1
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
Martin D.
6-36-2
Varillas J.
Rodriguez L.
6-26-4
Kozlov S.[8]
Torres J.
6-04-66-3