Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Mateus Alves — Bogota CH Round of 32

Bogota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG1
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#224ATP
1415ELO
1383Clay ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 November 2025
clay
BRA
Mateus Alves
#455ATP
1245ELO
1247Clay ELO
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLL
Ficovich J.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Alves M.
Ficovich J.
6362
Alves M.
4631

Juan Pablo Ficovich defeated Mateus Alves 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Bogota CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Juan Pablo Ficovich came in ranked #224, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ficovich J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Alves M.

Alves M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ficovich J.Alves M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
6.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 52). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ficovich J.Alves M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
16
8
Break points saved·Even
76
77
Break points won·Even
9
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
27
1
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
5
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ficovich J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Alves M.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.9+136 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Clay Elo 1247
7.4Overall Elo 1415
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1245
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.5
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.6
Context
7.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ficovich J.Alves M.
Freshness·Even
83
87

Ficovich J.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d) · Alves M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.
Sakamoto P.[7]
6-16-3
Mejia N.[2]
Gomez J.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Kypson P.
Casanova H.
3-67-647-5
Sakamoto P.[7]
Rodrigues P.
4-67-56-3
Mejia N.[2]
Mena F.
7-661-66-2
Gomez J.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-756-26-4
Quarter-finals
Kypson P.
Ejupovic E.
7-667-66
Rodrigues P.
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
6-46-3
Casanova H.
Kolar Z.
4-66-36-1
Sakamoto P.[7]
Barreiros Reyes M.
3-66-37-5
Ficovich J.[1]
Barrientos N.
6-26-2
Mena F.
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
6-26-4
Mejia N.[2]
Varillas J.
7-656-2
Gomez J.
Kozlov S.[8]
4-66-47-5
R16
Rodrigues P.
Mejia N.[1]
7-675-76-3
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
Rodriguez L.
6-36-2
Sakamoto P.[7]
Cid R.
2-66-46-2
Barreiros Reyes M.
Aboian L.
6-46-1
Ejupovic E.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
6-36-4
Casanova H.
Tobon M.
6-36-1
Barrientos N.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-4
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
Bertran P.
6-46-4
Mena F.
Mckennon M.
6-36-4
Varillas J.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
6-47-63
Mejia N.[2]
Martinez A.
6-36-2
Ficovich J.[1]
Mccormick T.
6-13-66-3
Gomez J.
Poling K.
5-76-36-2
Kozlov S.[8]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-46-4
R32
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
Monzon I.
6-26-1
Mejia N.[1]
Bertran P.
6-06-1
Barreiros Reyes M.
Gomez J.
6-36-4
Casanova H.
Alves M.[6]
2-67-627-5
Kypson P.
Olivo R.[8]
6-07-61
Sakamoto P.[7]
Price S.
6-36-4
Tobon M.
Nunez D.
3-66-27-63
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-46-757-66
Boscardin Dias P.
Ambrogi L.
6-47-63
Ejupovic E.
Soto M.[2]
7-636-4
Rodrigues P.
Roncadelli F.
6-27-5
Rodriguez L.
Kuzuhara B.
6-46-2
Kolar Z.
Sell K.[3]
6-33-66-1
Soriano Barrera A.
Heredia S.
5-76-46-0
Aboian L.
Mccormick T.
6-24-66-4
Cid R.
Pannu K.
6-27-65
Poling K.
Popko D.[4]
3-64-1
Ficovich J.[1]
Alves M.
6-43-66-3
Mccormick T.
Price S.
6-46-2
Gomez J.
Heredia S.
6-17-5
Bertran P.
Magadan A.
6-16-1
Mckennon M.
Dickerson R.
6-32-66-4
Mena F.
Pacheco Mendez R.[3]
6-46-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Linde Palacios S.
6-756-36-1
Martinez A.
Tobon M.
6-46-1
Mejia N.[2]
Gima S.
6-37-62
Hernandez Serrano J.
Johns G.[7]
7-646-2
Barrientos N.
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
3-66-26-4
Jorda Sanchis D.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-1
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
Martin D.
6-36-2
Varillas J.
Rodriguez L.
6-26-4
Kozlov S.[8]
Torres J.
6-04-66-3