Hernan Casanova vs Mateus Alves — Bogota CH Round of 32

Bogota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Hernan Casanova
ARG
Hernan Casanova
#337ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2025
clay
BRA6
Mateus Alves
#455ATP
1245ELO
1247Clay ELO
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLL
Casanova H.
2-6 7-6 7-5
Alves M.
Casanova H.
27772
Alves M.
66251

Hernan Casanova defeated Mateus Alves 2-6 7-6 7-5 in the Bogota CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Casanova H.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Alves M.

Alves M.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Casanova H.Alves M.
1st serve in·Clear edge
76%
60%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
60%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
58%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.5
6.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
0.9
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (40 vs 52). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Casanova H.Alves M.
Clutch Rating·Even
8
8
Break points saved·Dominant
24
77
Break points won·Clear edge
22
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
1
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
34
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Casanova H.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Alves M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+134 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Clay Elo 1247
6.8Overall Elo 1393
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1245
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.0
Surface form
3.6
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.1
Minutes 14d
6.2
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Casanova H.Alves M.
Freshness·Slight edge
70
78

Casanova H.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 62 games (7d) · Alves M.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 38 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.
Sakamoto P.[7]
6-16-3
Mejia N.[2]
Gomez J.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Kypson P.
Casanova H.
3-67-647-5
Sakamoto P.[7]
Rodrigues P.
4-67-56-3
Mejia N.[2]
Mena F.
7-661-66-2
Gomez J.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-756-26-4
Quarter-finals
Kypson P.
Ejupovic E.
7-667-66
Rodrigues P.
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
6-46-3
Casanova H.
Kolar Z.
4-66-36-1
Sakamoto P.[7]
Barreiros Reyes M.
3-66-37-5
Ficovich J.[1]
Barrientos N.
6-26-2
Mena F.
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
6-26-4
Mejia N.[2]
Varillas J.
7-656-2
Gomez J.
Kozlov S.[8]
4-66-47-5
R16
Rodrigues P.
Mejia N.[1]
7-675-76-3
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
Rodriguez L.
6-36-2
Sakamoto P.[7]
Cid R.
2-66-46-2
Barreiros Reyes M.
Aboian L.
6-46-1
Ejupovic E.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
6-36-4
Casanova H.
Tobon M.
6-36-1
Barrientos N.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-4
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
Bertran P.
6-46-4
Mena F.
Mckennon M.
6-36-4
Varillas J.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
6-47-63
Mejia N.[2]
Martinez A.
6-36-2
Ficovich J.[1]
Mccormick T.
6-13-66-3
Gomez J.
Poling K.
5-76-36-2
Kozlov S.[8]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-46-4
R32
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
Monzon I.
6-26-1
Mejia N.[1]
Bertran P.
6-06-1
Barreiros Reyes M.
Gomez J.
6-36-4
Casanova H.
Alves M.[6]
2-67-627-5
Kypson P.
Olivo R.[8]
6-07-61
Sakamoto P.[7]
Price S.
6-36-4
Tobon M.
Nunez D.
3-66-27-63
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-46-757-66
Boscardin Dias P.
Ambrogi L.
6-47-63
Ejupovic E.
Soto M.[2]
7-636-4
Rodrigues P.
Roncadelli F.
6-27-5
Rodriguez L.
Kuzuhara B.
6-46-2
Kolar Z.
Sell K.[3]
6-33-66-1
Soriano Barrera A.
Heredia S.
5-76-46-0
Aboian L.
Mccormick T.
6-24-66-4
Cid R.
Pannu K.
6-27-65
Poling K.
Popko D.[4]
3-64-1
Ficovich J.[1]
Alves M.
6-43-66-3
Mccormick T.
Price S.
6-46-2
Gomez J.
Heredia S.
6-17-5
Bertran P.
Magadan A.
6-16-1
Mckennon M.
Dickerson R.
6-32-66-4
Mena F.
Pacheco Mendez R.[3]
6-46-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Linde Palacios S.
6-756-36-1
Martinez A.
Tobon M.
6-46-1
Mejia N.[2]
Gima S.
6-37-62
Hernandez Serrano J.
Johns G.[7]
7-646-2
Barrientos N.
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
3-66-26-4
Jorda Sanchis D.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-1
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
Martin D.
6-36-2
Varillas J.
Rodriguez L.
6-26-4
Kozlov S.[8]
Torres J.
6-04-66-3