Adam Walton vs Fajing Sun — Shenzhen Longhua CH Round of 16

Shenzhen Longhua CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Adam Walton
AUS2
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 October 2024
hard
CHN
Fajing Sun
#273ATP
1496ELO
1473Hard ELO
$32kYTD
$490kCAREER
29 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
Walton A.
7-6 7-5
Sun F.
Walton A.
7772
Sun F.
6550

Adam Walton defeated Fajing Sun 7-6 7-5 in the Shenzhen Longhua CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Sun F.

Sun F.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Sun F.
35
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Sun F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 97). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Sun F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
5
Break points saved·Dominant
95
65
Break points won·Slight edge
20
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Sun F.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+196 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1473
6.7Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1496
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.5
Surface form
4.2
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
5.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Sun F.
Freshness·Dominant
46
95

Walton A.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d) · Sun F.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mcdonald M.[5]
Cazaux A.[1]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Bai Y.
6-46-0
Mcdonald M.[5]
Walton A.[2]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bai Y.
Purtseladze S.
7-55-2
Walton A.[2]
Mccabe J.[8]
6-33-0
Mcdonald M.[5]
Van Wyk K.
6-36-2
Cazaux A.[1]
Weber A.
6-16-3
R16
Cazaux A.[1]
Zhang T.
7-656-1
Weber A.
Te R.
6-37-5
Purtseladze S.
Harris B.[3]
6-47-65
Bai Y.
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Mcdonald M.[5]
Noguchi R.
6-26-3
Van Wyk K.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-66
Mccabe J.[8]
Xiao L.
6-36-3
Walton A.[2]
Sun F.
7-657-5
R32
Ramanathan R.
Blanchet U.[4]
7-646-767-68
Mcdonald M.[5]
Fancutt T.
7-656-756-1
Bai Y.
Hsu Y.[6]
6-43-66-2
Purtseladze S.
Chen X.
6-36-1
Cazaux A.[1]
Zeng Y.
6-36-2
Zhang T.
Sekulic P.
3-66-37-5
Weber A.
Uchida K.
4-67-56-3
Te R.
Shimizu Y.[7]
6-36-4
Harris B.[3]
Samrej K.
6-46-716-3
Mukund S.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-13-66-2
Noguchi R.
Takahashi Y.
6-36-2
Van Wyk K.
Leong M.
7-642-67-5
Mccabe J.[8]
Ursu V.
2-66-36-3
Xiao L.
Mo Y.
6-16-4
Sun F.
Matsuda R.
7-56-3
Walton A.[2]
Cui J.
6-46-3