Adam Walton vs James Mccabe — Shenzhen Longhua CH Quarter-final

Shenzhen Longhua CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Adam Walton
AUS2
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 14 October 2024
hard
AUS8
James Mccabe
#242ATP
1532ELO
1481Hard ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
Walton A.
6-3 3-0
Mccabe J.
Walton A.
63–
Mccabe J.
30–

Adam Walton advanced when James Mccabe retired 6-3 3-0 in the Shenzhen Longhua CH quarter-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Mccabe J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Mccabe J.
35
Serve
—
17
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Mccabe J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.2
8.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Mccabe J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
37
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
85
Break points won·Slight edge
20
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
95
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Mccabe J.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+188 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Hard Elo 1481
7.1Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1532
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.5
Surface form
4.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
9.3
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Mccabe J.
Freshness·Dominant
54
95

Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d) · Mccabe J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mcdonald M.[5]
Cazaux A.[1]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Bai Y.
6-46-0
Mcdonald M.[5]
Walton A.[2]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bai Y.
Purtseladze S.
7-55-2
Walton A.[2]
Mccabe J.[8]
6-33-0
Mcdonald M.[5]
Van Wyk K.
6-36-2
Cazaux A.[1]
Weber A.
6-16-3
R16
Cazaux A.[1]
Zhang T.
7-656-1
Weber A.
Te R.
6-37-5
Purtseladze S.
Harris B.[3]
6-47-65
Bai Y.
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Mcdonald M.[5]
Noguchi R.
6-26-3
Van Wyk K.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-66
Mccabe J.[8]
Xiao L.
6-36-3
Walton A.[2]
Sun F.
7-657-5
R32
Ramanathan R.
Blanchet U.[4]
7-646-767-68
Mcdonald M.[5]
Fancutt T.
7-656-756-1
Bai Y.
Hsu Y.[6]
6-43-66-2
Purtseladze S.
Chen X.
6-36-1
Cazaux A.[1]
Zeng Y.
6-36-2
Zhang T.
Sekulic P.
3-66-37-5
Weber A.
Uchida K.
4-67-56-3
Te R.
Shimizu Y.[7]
6-36-4
Harris B.[3]
Samrej K.
6-46-716-3
Mukund S.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-13-66-2
Noguchi R.
Takahashi Y.
6-36-2
Van Wyk K.
Leong M.
7-642-67-5
Mccabe J.[8]
Ursu V.
2-66-36-3
Xiao L.
Mo Y.
6-16-4
Sun F.
Matsuda R.
7-56-3
Walton A.[2]
Cui J.
6-46-3