Arthur Cazaux vs Yan Bai — Shenzhen Longhua CH Semi-final

Shenzhen Longhua CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Arthur Cazaux
FRA1
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 October 2024
hard
CHN
Yan Bai
#1489ATP
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
Cazaux A.
6-4 6-0
Bai Y.
Cazaux A.
662
Bai Y.
400

Arthur Cazaux defeated Yan Bai 6-4 6-0 in the Shenzhen Longhua CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Bai Y.

Bai Y.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Bai Y.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Bai Y.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Clear edge
65%
52%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
3.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (115 vs 34). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Bai Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
18
Break points saved·Dominant
97
23
Break points won·Slight edge
27
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bai Y.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.6
Minutes 14d
6.0
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mcdonald M.[5]
Cazaux A.[1]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Bai Y.
6-46-0
Mcdonald M.[5]
Walton A.[2]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bai Y.
Purtseladze S.
7-55-2
Walton A.[2]
Mccabe J.[8]
6-33-0
Mcdonald M.[5]
Van Wyk K.
6-36-2
Cazaux A.[1]
Weber A.
6-16-3
R16
Cazaux A.[1]
Zhang T.
7-656-1
Weber A.
Te R.
6-37-5
Purtseladze S.
Harris B.[3]
6-47-65
Bai Y.
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Mcdonald M.[5]
Noguchi R.
6-26-3
Van Wyk K.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-66
Mccabe J.[8]
Xiao L.
6-36-3
Walton A.[2]
Sun F.
7-657-5
R32
Ramanathan R.
Blanchet U.[4]
7-646-767-68
Mcdonald M.[5]
Fancutt T.
7-656-756-1
Bai Y.
Hsu Y.[6]
6-43-66-2
Purtseladze S.
Chen X.
6-36-1
Cazaux A.[1]
Zeng Y.
6-36-2
Zhang T.
Sekulic P.
3-66-37-5
Weber A.
Uchida K.
4-67-56-3
Te R.
Shimizu Y.[7]
6-36-4
Harris B.[3]
Samrej K.
6-46-716-3
Mukund S.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-13-66-2
Noguchi R.
Takahashi Y.
6-36-2
Van Wyk K.
Leong M.
7-642-67-5
Mccabe J.[8]
Ursu V.
2-66-36-3
Xiao L.
Mo Y.
6-16-4
Sun F.
Matsuda R.
7-56-3
Walton A.[2]
Cui J.
6-46-3