Iga Swiatek vs Coco GauffRoland Garros Semi-final

Roland Garros · WTA · Semi-final
#3WTA
2064ELO
2008Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$46MCAREER
25 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 May 2024
clay
#7WTA
2071ELO
2018Clay ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
Swiatek I.
6-2 6-4
Gauff C.
Swiatek I.
662
Gauff C.
240

Iga Swiatek defeated Coco Gauff 6-2 6-4 in the Roland Garros semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Iga Swiatek came in ranked #3, leading the head-to-head 10–5, defending the title. Iga Swiatek extended the head-to-head to 11–5.

Key context

Head to head

105
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-05United CupSFhardCoco Gauff6-4 6-2
2025-04-22MadridSFclayCoco Gauff6-1 6-1
2024-12-27United CupFhardCoco Gauff6-4 6-4
2024-11-04Riyadh FinalsRRhardCoco Gauff6-3 6-4
2024-05-06RomeSFclayIga Swiatek6-4 6-3
2023-10-30Cancun FinalsRRhardIga Swiatek6-0 7-5
2023-10-02BeijingSFhardIga Swiatek6-2 6-3
2023-08-14CincinnatiSFhardCoco Gauff7-6(2) 3-6 6-4
2023-05-29Roland GarrosQFclayIga Swiatek6-4 6-2
2023-02-20DubaiSFhardIga Swiatek6-4 6-2
2022-10-31Fort Worth FinalsRRhardIga Swiatek6-3 6-0
2022-10-10San DiegoQFhardIga Swiatek6-0 6-3
2022-05-23Roland GarrosFclayIga Swiatek6-1 6-3
2022-03-21MiamiR16hardIga Swiatek6-3 6-1
2021-05-10RomeSFclayIga Swiatek7-6(3) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Swiatek I.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Gauff C.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Swiatek I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
43%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
48%
48%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
6.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
100
99
Break points saved·Even
98
96
Break points won·Even
100
100
Deciding sets·Even
99
100
Tiebreaks·Even
98
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
8.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Clay Elo 2008
Surface ELO
5.2+10 Clay Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 2064
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 2071
10.0
H2H
0.0
10.0
Surface form
7.1
10.014-match win streak
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.6
Country comfort
Context
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Dominant
91
60

Swiatek I.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Gauff C.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
16°CDrizzle
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 63%

Draw

Semi-finals
Swiatek I.[3]
Gauff C.[4]
6-26-4
Paolini J.[13]
Andreeva M.[8]
6-36-1
R128
Vekic D.
Tsurenko L.
6-5
Zheng Q.[7]
Cornet A.
6-26-1
Svitolina E.[7]
Pliskova K.[20]
3-66-46-2
Rus A.
Kerber A.
6-46-3
Uchijima M.
Burillo Escorihuela I.
6-16-1
Sherif M.
Yuan Y.[10]
6-16-3
Osaka N.[16]
Bronzetti L.
6-14-67-5
Martic P.
Mladenovic K.
6-46-4
Avanesyan E.
Zhu L.
6-26-4
Navarro E.[22]
Sonmez Z.
6-26-0
Paquet C.
Shnaider D.[25]
6-36-1
Golubic V.
Krejcikova B.[24]
7-636-4
Stearns P.
Ciric Bagaric L.
6-36-787-66
Yastremska D.[30]
Tomljanovic A.
3-66-36-3
Garcia C.[21]
Lys E.
4-67-56-2
Blinkova A.
Cirstea S.[18]
6-33-67-65
Mertens E.[23]
Carle M.
6-37-68
Gracheva V.
Sakkari M.[6]
3-66-46-3
Danilovic O.
Trevisan M.
6-16-2
Siniakova K.[32]
Galfi D.
7-57-63
Kostyuk M.[15]
Pigossi L.
7-56-746-4
Volynets K.
Krunic A.
7-646-2
Vondrousova M.[5]
Masarova R.
6-16-3
Zidansek T.[22]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-22-66-1
Cocciaretto E.
Haddad Maia B.[13]
3-66-46-1
Kenin S.
Siegemund L.
4-66-26-2
Wang X.[32]
Bai Z.
7-56-746-3
Osorio C.
Kalinina A.
3-67-624-1
Jabeur O.[8]
Vickery S.
6-36-2
Korpatsch T.
Krueger A.
4-66-47-69
Parry D.
Ferro F.
3-66-36-3
Bogdan A.
Jacquemot E.
6-16-3
Pera B.
Hibino N.
6-26-0
Rybakina E.[2]
Minnen G.
6-26-3
Azarenka V.[19]
Podoroska N.
6-16-0
Keys M.[19]
Zarazua R.
6-36-2
Errani S.
Schmiedlova A.
6-36-2
Badosa P.
Boulter K.[26]
4-67-56-4
Putintseva Y.
Stephens S.
6-16-2
Begu I.
Riera J.
6-26-2
Pavlyuchenkova A.[20]
Udvardy P.
6-36-4
Kasatkina D.[10]
Frech M.
7-56-1
Anisimova A.[6]
Sramkova R.
7-666-4
Paolini J.[13]
Saville D.
6-36-4
Fett J.
Bouzas Maneiro J.
6-23-67-5
Wang X.
Niemeier J.
0-66-26-4
Collins D.[11]
Dolehide C.
6-36-4
Tomova V.
Alexandrova E.[14]
6-37-65
Wang Y.
Timofeeva M.[24]
6-36-3
Bucsa C.[31]
Starodubtseva Y.
6-46-1
Ostapenko J.[29]
Cristian J.
6-47-5
Tauson C.[21]
Maria T.
6-26-3
Fernandez L.[24]
Ponchet J.
6-26-0
Kalinskaya A.[22]
Burel C.
7-637-5
Andreescu B.[25]
Sorribes Tormo S.
7-56-1
Andreeva M.[8]
Bektas E.
6-26-3
Swiatek I.[3]
Jeanjean L.
6-16-2
Sabalenka A.[1]
Andreeva E.
6-16-2
Gauff C.[4]
Avdeeva J.
6-16-1
Baptiste H.[26]
Day K.
4-66-26-2
Noskova L.[12]
Dart H.
7-636-4
Bouzkova M.[27]
Kudermetova V.[29]
6-26-4
Samsonova L.[20]
Linette M.
6-16-1
Potapova A.[28]
Rakhimova K.
6-26-3