Iga Swiatek vs Coco Gauff — Dubai Semi-final

Dubai · WTA · Semi-final
Iga Swiatek
POL1
Iga Swiatek
#3WTA
2064ELO
2022Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$46MCAREER
25 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 February 2023
hard
Coco Gauff
USA5
Coco Gauff
#7WTA
2071ELO
2035Hard ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
Swiatek I.
6-4 6-2
Gauff C.
Swiatek I.
662
Gauff C.
420

Iga Swiatek defeated Coco Gauff 6-4 6-2 in the Dubai semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Iga Swiatek came in ranked #3, leading the head-to-head 10–5, defending last year's round of 16. Iga Swiatek extended the head-to-head to 11–5.

Key context

Head to head

10–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-05United CupSFhardCoco Gauff6-4 6-2
2025-04-22MadridSFclayCoco Gauff6-1 6-1
2024-12-27United CupFhardCoco Gauff6-4 6-4
2024-11-04Riyadh FinalsRRhardCoco Gauff6-3 6-4
2024-05-27Roland GarrosSFclayIga Swiatek6-2 6-4
2024-05-06RomeSFclayIga Swiatek6-4 6-3
2023-10-30Cancun FinalsRRhardIga Swiatek6-0 7-5
2023-10-02BeijingSFhardIga Swiatek6-2 6-3
2023-08-14CincinnatiSFhardCoco Gauff7-6(2) 3-6 6-4
2023-05-29Roland GarrosQFclayIga Swiatek6-4 6-2
2022-10-31Fort Worth FinalsRRhardIga Swiatek6-3 6-0
2022-10-10San DiegoQFhardIga Swiatek6-0 6-3
2022-05-23Roland GarrosFclayIga Swiatek6-1 6-3
2022-03-21MiamiR16hardIga Swiatek6-3 6-1
2021-05-10RomeSFclayIga Swiatek7-6(3) 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Swiatek I.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Gauff C.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Swiatek I.

Serve advantage — Swiatek I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Swiatek I.Gauff C.
67
Serve
25
98
Return
100

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Swiatek I.Gauff C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
44%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
48%
48%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
5.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Swiatek I.Gauff C.
Clutch Rating·Even
100
99
Break points saved·Even
98
96
Break points won·Even
100
100
Deciding sets·Even
99
100
Tiebreaks·Even
98
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Swiatek I.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gauff C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Hard Elo 2022
Surface ELO
5.2+13 Hard Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 2064
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 2071
10.0
H2H
0.0
8.4
Surface form
7.5
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.9
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Swiatek I.Gauff C.
Freshness·Dominant
91
60

Swiatek I.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Gauff C.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
22°COvercast
Wind 23 km/hHumidity 60%

Draw

Final
Krejcikova B.
Swiatek I.[1]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Krejcikova B.
Pegula J.[3]
6-15-76-0
Swiatek I.[1]
Gauff C.[5]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Pegula J.[3]
Muchova K.
W/O
Swiatek I.[1]
Pliskova K.
W/O
Krejcikova B.
Sabalenka A.[2]
0-67-626-1
Gauff C.[5]
Keys M.
6-27-5
R16
Krejcikova B.
Kvitova P.[12]
6-36-2
Gauff C.[5]
Rybakina E.[9]
W/O
Swiatek I.[1]
Samsonova L.[14]
6-16-0
Muchova K.
Bencic B.[8]
6-16-4
Keys M.
Azarenka V.[15]
6-26-1
Pegula J.[3]
Bogdan A.
6-46-3
Pliskova K.
Kalinina A.
7-56-766-2
Sabalenka A.[2]
Ostapenko J.[13]
2-66-16-1
R32
Samsonova L.[14]
Zheng Q.
W/O
Swiatek I.[1]
Fernandez L.
6-16-1
Rybakina E.[9]
Bouzkova M.
7-56-2
Gauff C.[5]
Sasnovich A.
6-06-4
Bencic B.[8]
Kostyuk M.
6-777-656-4
Pegula J.[3]
Tomova V.
6-25-76-1
Muchova K.
Cirstea S.
6-47-64
Kalinina A.
Yastremska D.
5-76-26-3
Pliskova K.
Sakkari M.[6]
6-16-2
Keys M.
Garcia C.[4]
7-56-4
Azarenka V.[15]
Anisimova A.
4-66-47-65
Krejcikova B.
Kasatkina D.[7]
6-44-67-5
Kvitova P.[12]
Putintseva Y.
6-46-4
Ostapenko J.[13]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-26-0
Sabalenka A.[2]
Davis L.
6-06-1
Bogdan A.
Rogers S.
7-636-3
R64
Kalinina A.
Kudermetova V.[10]
6-35-77-5
Pliskova K.
Vondrousova M.
6-36-4
Keys M.
Paolini J.
6-16-1
Bouzkova M.
Kenin S.
6-16-1
Bogdan A.
Siegemund L.
7-56-3
Ostapenko J.[13]
Zavatska K.
6-16-4
Davis L.
Teichmann J.
6-44-66-3
Yastremska D.
Cornet A.
6-26-3
Kostyuk M.
Oz I.
4-66-46-2
Sasnovich A.
Masarova R.
2-66-46-4
Samsonova L.[14]
Badosa P.
6-737-656-4
Rybakina E.[9]
Andreescu B.
6-36-4
Rogers S.
Liu C.
6-46-4
Kvitova P.[12]
Trevisan M.
6-26-1
Fruhvirtova L.
Collins D.
6-36-4
Azarenka V.[15]
Pavlyuchenkova A.
6-37-5
Tomova V.
Kanepi K.
6-36-1
Muchova K.
Pera B.
6-16-4
Cirstea S.
Haddad Maia B.[11]
4-67-677-5
Putintseva Y.
Martic P.
6-40-66-2
Fernandez L.
Grabher J.
6-46-2
Krejcikova B.
Begu I.
6-46-2
Zheng Q.
Zhang S.
6-36-1
Anisimova A.
Zvonareva V.
6-36-2