Iga Swiatek vs Coco GauffRoland Garros Quarter-final

Roland Garros · WTA · Quarter-final
#3WTA
2064ELO
2008Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$46MCAREER
25 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 May 2023
clay
#7WTA
2071ELO
2018Clay ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
Swiatek I.
6-4 6-2
Gauff C.
Swiatek I.
662
Gauff C.
420

Iga Swiatek defeated Coco Gauff 6-4 6-2 in the Roland Garros quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Iga Swiatek came in ranked #3, leading the head-to-head 10–5, defending the title. Iga Swiatek extended the head-to-head to 11–5.

Key context

Head to head

105
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-05United CupSFhardCoco Gauff6-4 6-2
2025-04-22MadridSFclayCoco Gauff6-1 6-1
2024-12-27United CupFhardCoco Gauff6-4 6-4
2024-11-04Riyadh FinalsRRhardCoco Gauff6-3 6-4
2024-05-27Roland GarrosSFclayIga Swiatek6-2 6-4
2024-05-06RomeSFclayIga Swiatek6-4 6-3
2023-10-30Cancun FinalsRRhardIga Swiatek6-0 7-5
2023-10-02BeijingSFhardIga Swiatek6-2 6-3
2023-08-14CincinnatiSFhardCoco Gauff7-6(2) 3-6 6-4
2023-02-20DubaiSFhardIga Swiatek6-4 6-2
2022-10-31Fort Worth FinalsRRhardIga Swiatek6-3 6-0
2022-10-10San DiegoQFhardIga Swiatek6-0 6-3
2022-05-23Roland GarrosFclayIga Swiatek6-1 6-3
2022-03-21MiamiR16hardIga Swiatek6-3 6-1
2021-05-10RomeSFclayIga Swiatek7-6(3) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Swiatek I.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Gauff C.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Swiatek I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
44%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
48%
48%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
5.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
100
99
Break points saved·Even
98
96
Break points won·Even
100
100
Deciding sets·Even
99
100
Tiebreaks·Even
98
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Clay Elo 2008
Surface ELO
5.2+10 Clay Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 2064
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 2071
10.0
H2H
0.0
8.0
Surface form
6.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
7.5
Country comfort

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Dominant
91
60

Swiatek I.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Gauff C.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
20°CClear
Wind 20 km/hHumidity 60%

Draw

R128
Swiatek I.[3]
Bucsa C.[31]
6-46-0
Peterson R.
Ferro F.
6-26-0
Navarro E.
Andreeva E.
6-23-66-4
Bolsova A.
Kucova K.
6-26-1
Day K.
Mladenovic K.
7-56-1
Danilovic O.
Baindl K.
6-36-2
Dodin O.
Janicijevic S.
0-66-26-1
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-26-2
Samsonova L.[20]
Volynets K.
6-06-1
Giorgi C.
Cornet A.
6-36-4
Stearns P.
Siniakova K.
7-676-2
Ostapenko J.[29]
Martincova T.
6-37-5
Osorio C.
Bogdan A.
3-66-37-5
Haddad Maia B.[14]
Maria T.
6-06-1
Andreescu B.[25]
Azarenka V.[18]
2-66-36-4
Waltert S.
Mandlik E.
6-14-66-2
Shnaider D.[25]
Marino R.
6-37-5
Stephens S.
Pliskova K.[20]
6-06-4
Frech M.
Zhang S.[29]
6-16-1
Kasatkina D.[9]
Niemeier J.
6-36-4
Noskova L.[12]
Kovinic D.
6-32-1
Alexandrova E.[14]
Tomova V.
6-12-66-1
Davis L.
Zhu L.
6-36-3
Tsurenko L.
Krejcikova B.[13]
6-26-4
Parry D.
Kalinina A.[25]
6-26-3
Grabher J.
Rus A.
6-26-3
Sorribes Tormo S.
Burel C.
7-606-2
Martic P.
Rogers S.[32]
3-66-36-2
Friedsam A.
Hibino N.
6-33-66-4
Pera B.
Kontaveit A.
7-666-2
Vekic D.[22]
Yastremska D.
6-27-5
Jabeur O.[7]
Bronzetti L.
6-46-1
Podoroska N.
Ponchet J.
6-06-2
Errani S.
Teichmann J.
3-66-46-2
Muchova K.[10]
Sakkari M.[8]
7-657-5
Jeanjean L.
Birrell K.
6-46-766-3
Fernandez L.[24]
Linette M.[21]
6-31-66-3
Avanesyan E.
Bencic B.[11]
6-32-66-4
Potapova A.[28]
Townsend T.
6-16-2
Sherif M.
Brengle M.
6-36-1
Blinkova A.
Bonaventure Y.
6-26-0
Hunter S.
Parrizas Diaz N.
4-66-26-4
Svitolina E.[7]
Trevisan M.[26]
6-26-2
Vondrousova M.
Parks A.
6-46-0
Gracheva V.
Galfi D.
6-42-66-1
Rakhimova K.
Bejlek S.
6-06-3
Shymanovich I.
Udvardy P.
6-766-36-1
Schmiedlova A.
Kudermetova V.[11]
6-36-1
Putintseva Y.
Zanevska M.
7-57-63
Sabalenka A.[1]
Kostyuk M.[15]
6-36-2
Begu I.[27]
Bondar A.
6-46-2
Tauson C.[21]
Sasnovich A.[14]
6-26-0
Cocciaretto E.
Kvitova P.[10]
6-36-4
Liu C.
In Albon Y.
6-16-4
Andreeva M.[8]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-26-1
Keys M.[19]
Kanepi K.
6-13-66-1
Gauff C.[4]
Masarova R.
3-66-16-2
Paolini J.[13]
Cirstea S.[18]
7-52-66-2
Mertens E.[23]
Hruncakova V.
6-16-4
Pegula J.[5]
Collins D.
6-46-2
Garcia C.[5]
Wang X.[32]
7-644-66-4
Zheng Q.[19]
Zidansek T.[22]
6-36-1
Rybakina E.[2]
Fruhvirtova B.
6-46-2
Wang X.
Bouzkova M.[27]
6-47-65