Iga Swiatek vs Coco GauffRoland Garros Final

Roland Garros · WTA · Final
#3WTA
2064ELO
2008Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$46MCAREER
25 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 May 2022
clay
#7WTA
2071ELO
2018Clay ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
Swiatek I.
6-1 6-3
Gauff C.
Swiatek I.
662
Gauff C.
130

Iga Swiatek defeated Coco Gauff 6-1 6-3 in the Roland Garros final on clay. The result followed the form book — Iga Swiatek came in ranked #3, leading the head-to-head 10–5, defending last year's quarter-final. Iga Swiatek extended the head-to-head to 11–5.

Key context

Head to head

105
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-05United CupSFhardCoco Gauff6-4 6-2
2025-04-22MadridSFclayCoco Gauff6-1 6-1
2024-12-27United CupFhardCoco Gauff6-4 6-4
2024-11-04Riyadh FinalsRRhardCoco Gauff6-3 6-4
2024-05-27Roland GarrosSFclayIga Swiatek6-2 6-4
2024-05-06RomeSFclayIga Swiatek6-4 6-3
2023-10-30Cancun FinalsRRhardIga Swiatek6-0 7-5
2023-10-02BeijingSFhardIga Swiatek6-2 6-3
2023-08-14CincinnatiSFhardCoco Gauff7-6(2) 3-6 6-4
2023-05-29Roland GarrosQFclayIga Swiatek6-4 6-2
2023-02-20DubaiSFhardIga Swiatek6-4 6-2
2022-10-31Fort Worth FinalsRRhardIga Swiatek6-3 6-0
2022-10-10San DiegoQFhardIga Swiatek6-0 6-3
2022-03-21MiamiR16hardIga Swiatek6-3 6-1
2021-05-10RomeSFclayIga Swiatek7-6(3) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Swiatek I.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Gauff C.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Swiatek I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
44%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
48%
48%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
5.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
100
99
Break points saved·Even
98
96
Break points won·Even
100
100
Deciding sets·Even
99
100
Tiebreaks·Even
98
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
8.2
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Clay Elo 2008
Surface ELO
5.2+10 Clay Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 2064
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 2071
10.0
H2H
0.0
10.0
Surface form
6.3
10.020-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
7.5
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Dominant
91
60

Swiatek I.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Gauff C.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
18°CDrizzle
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 88%

Draw

Final
Swiatek I.[3]
Gauff C.[4]
6-16-3
R128
Halep S.[19]
Schunk N.
6-41-66-1
Zheng Q.
Zanevska M.
6-36-1
Kovinic D.
Samsonova L.[20]
2-66-26-1
Kalinina A.
Baptiste H.[26]
5-2
Sherif M.
Kostyuk M.[15]
6-37-5
Alexandrova E.[14]
Minnen G.
7-56-3
Begu I.
Paolini J.[13]
4-66-17-65
Jeanjean L.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-46-3
Pliskova K.[20]
Andrianjafitrimo T.
2-66-36-1
Badosa P.[3]
Ferro F.
6-26-0
Krunic A.
Rakhimova K.
6-46-3
Juvan K.[11]
Selekhmeteva O.
7-57-64
Kudermetova V.[29]
Zhu L.
6-43-66-3
Keys M.[19]
Kalinskaya A.[22]
6-33-66-4
Linette M.
Jabeur O.[6]
3-67-647-5
Trevisan M.
Dart H.
6-06-2
Kvitova P.[32]
Bondar A.
7-606-1
Fernandez L.[24]
Mladenovic K.
6-07-5
Anisimova A.[6]
Osaka N.[16]
7-56-4
Bouzkova M.[27]
Gasanova A.
6-26-1
Mertens E.[23]
Ruse E.
6-36-1
Gauff C.[4]
Marino R.
7-56-0
Van Uytvanck A.
Li A.[30]
3-62-3
Azarenka V.[15]
Bogdan A.
6-777-616-2
Schmiedlova A.
Kucova K.
4-67-616-2
Osorio C.
Tan H.
6-46-3
Riske Amritraj A.
Yastremska D.
6-36-3
Cornet A.
Doi M.
6-26-0
Rybakina E.[2]
Rus A.
6-15-76-2
Sabalenka A.[1]
Paquet C.
2-66-36-4
Haddad Maia B.
Bucsa C.[31]
6-31-66-2
Cirstea S.[18]
Maria T.
6-36-3
Ostapenko J.[29]
Bronzetti L.
6-16-4
Pegula J.[5]
Wang Q.
6-26-4
Zidansek T.[22]
Liu C.
6-26-2
Garcia C.
Townsend T.
6-36-4
Collins D.[9]
Tomova V.
6-06-4
Rogers S.
Martincova T.
6-46-3
Contreras Gomez F.
Udvardy P.
7-686-3
Giorgi C.[28]
Zhang S.
3-66-26-2
Putintseva Y.
Bara I.
6-36-1
Brengle M.
Buzarnescu M.
6-16-2
Raducanu E.[12]
Noskova L.[12]
6-747-56-1
Kerber A.[21]
Frech M.
2-66-37-5
Jacquemot E.
Watson H.
6-36-3
Siniakova K.
Martic P.
6-47-66
Muchova K.[10]
Monnet C.
6-36-3
Vekic D.
Bjorklund M.
7-666-2
Sakkari M.[4]
Burel C.
6-26-3
Gracheva V.
Sharma A.
4-66-47-5
Petkovic A.
Dodin O.
6-46-2
Danilovic O.
Galfi D.
3-67-646-2
Parry D.
Krejcikova B.[2]
1-66-26-3
Saville D.
Grammatikopoulou V.
6-16-2
Tomljanovic A.
Kontaveit A.[5]
7-657-5
Stephens S.
Niemeier J.
5-76-46-2
Andreescu B.[25]
Bonaventure Y.
3-67-56-0
Teichmann J.[23]
Pera B.
6-26-1
Volynets K.
Golubic V.
6-22-66-1
Kanepi K.
Muguruza G.[10]
2-66-36-4
Kasatkina D.[20]
Sramkova R.
6-26-0
Bencic B.[11]
Jani R.
6-16-1
Sasnovich A.[14]
Wang X.
6-46-1
Swiatek I.[3]
Tsurenko L.
6-26-0