Jessica Pegula vs Iga Swiatek — Montreal Semi-final

Montreal · WTA · Semi-final
Jessica Pegula
USA4
Jessica Pegula
#3WTA
2097ELO
2058Hard ELO
$2.8MYTD
$25MCAREER
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
hard
Iga Swiatek
POL1
Iga Swiatek
#8WTA
2064ELO
2022Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$46MCAREER
25 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWLW
Pegula J.
6-2 6-7 6-4
Swiatek I.
Pegula J.
66462
Swiatek I.
27741

Jessica Pegula defeated Iga Swiatek 6-2 6-7 6-4 in the Montreal semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jessica Pegula came in ranked #3. Jessica Pegula narrowed the head-to-head to 7–5.

Key context

  • Match story: Jessica Pegula closed it out in three sets, 6–2 6–7 6–4.

Head to head

4–7
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-13RomeQFclayIga Swiatek1-6 2-6
2025-06-22Bad HomburgFgrassJessica Pegula6-4 7-5
2024-08-26US OpenQFhardJessica Pegula6-2 6-4
2023-10-30Cancun FinalsFhardIga Swiatek6-1 6-0
2023-02-13DohaFhardIga Swiatek6-3 6-0
2023-01-02United CupSFhardJessica Pegula6-2 6-2
2022-10-10San DiegoSFhardIga Swiatek4-6 6-2 6-2
2022-08-29US OpenQFhardIga Swiatek6-3 7-6(4)
2022-05-23Roland GarrosQFclayIga Swiatek6-3 6-2
2022-03-21MiamiSFhardIga Swiatek6-2 7-5
2019-07-29WashingtonR16hardJessica Pegula5-7 6-4 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Pegula J.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Swiatek I.

Swiatek I.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Pegula J.

Serve advantage — Swiatek I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Pegula J.Swiatek I.
68
Serve
67
73
Return
98

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Pegula J.Swiatek I.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
45%
48%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pegula J.Swiatek I.
Clutch Rating·Even
96
100
Break points saved·Even
96
98
Break points won·Even
99
100
Deciding sets·Even
100
99
Tiebreaks·Even
96
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pegula J.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Swiatek I.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+36 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 2022
5.4Overall Elo 2097
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 2064
2.7
H2H
7.3
7.8
Surface form
8.0
0.0
Win streak
10.08-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
5.4
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Pegula J.Swiatek I.
Freshness·Clear edge
79
92

Pegula J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d) · Swiatek I.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
22°COvercast
Wind 15 km/hHumidity 68%

Draw

Final
Pegula J.[4]
Samsonova L.[15]
6-16-0
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[4]
Swiatek I.[1]
6-26-746-4
Samsonova L.[15]
Rybakina E.[3]
1-66-16-2
Quarter-finals
Pegula J.[4]
Gauff C.[6]
6-25-77-5
Rybakina E.[3]
Kasatkina D.[10]
5-77-57-68
Samsonova L.[15]
Bencic B.[12]
6-46-4
Swiatek I.[1]
Collins D.
6-34-66-2
R16
Swiatek I.[1]
Muchova K.[14]
6-14-66-4
Gauff C.[6]
Vondrousova M.[9]
6-36-0
Rybakina E.[3]
Stephens S.
6-36-3
Bencic B.[12]
Kvitova P.[7]
6-736-36-1
Kasatkina D.[10]
Bouzkova M.
6-36-4
Samsonova L.[15]
Sabalenka A.[2]
7-624-66-3
Collins D.
Fernandez L.
6-26-3
Pegula J.[4]
Paolini J.
6-46-0
R32
Muchova K.[14]
Cirstea S.
7-56-4
Pegula J.[4]
Putintseva Y.
6-46-4
Paolini J.
Keys M.[13]
W/O
Stephens S.
Azarenka V.[16]
W/O
Gauff C.[6]
Boulter K.
6-26-2
Rybakina E.[3]
Brady J.
6-737-656-3
Bencic B.[12]
Parks A.
6-35-76-4
Sabalenka A.[2]
Martic P.
6-37-65
Samsonova L.[15]
Zheng Q.
6-36-2
Vondrousova M.[9]
Wozniacki C.
6-27-5
Kvitova P.[7]
Giorgi C.
6-25-76-0
Fernandez L.
Haddad Maia B.[11]
7-55-76-3
Collins D.
Sakkari M.[8]
6-46-2
Kasatkina D.[10]
Blinkova A.
6-27-5
Swiatek I.[1]
Pliskova K.
7-666-2
Bouzkova M.
Garcia C.[5]
6-44-66-2
R64
Paolini J.
Vekic D.
7-636-2
Zheng Q.
Kostyuk M.
6-21-66-3
Samsonova L.[15]
Siniakova K.
4-66-26-3
Muchova K.[14]
Potapova A.
7-646-2
Pliskova K.
Zhu L.
6-36-786-2
Haddad Maia B.[11]
Frech M.
6-46-2
Fernandez L.
Stearns P.
6-36-2
Collins D.
Svitolina E.
6-26-2
Putintseva Y.
Pera B.
6-36-4
Keys M.[13]
Williams V.
6-27-5
Vondrousova M.[9]
Sherif M.
6-46-2
Boulter K.
Marino R.
6-36-1
Bouzkova M.
Day K.
7-616-3
Kasatkina D.[10]
Mertens E.
6-46-2
Azarenka V.[16]
Linette M.
6-36-0
Stephens S.
Kalinina A.
6-47-62
Brady J.
Ostapenko J.
7-670-67-68
Giorgi C.
Andreescu B.
6-36-2
Bencic B.[12]
Bronzetti L.
6-26-3
Wozniacki C.
Birrell K.
6-26-2
Parks A.
Davis L.
7-54-66-2
Martic P.
Bucsa C.
6-06-4
Cirstea S.
Gracheva V.
6-47-63
Blinkova A.
Zhang S.
4-66-26-3