Blaz Rola vs Thai Son Kwiatkowski — Knoxville CH Round of 32

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SLO
Blaz Rola
35 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
USA
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Rola B.
6-3 7-6
Kwiatkowski T.
Rola B.
6772
Kwiatkowski T.
3650

Blaz Rola defeated Thai Son Kwiatkowski 6-3 7-6 in the Knoxville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Blaz Rola closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rola B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Kwiatkowski T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rola B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rola B.Kwiatkowski T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.4
6.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (88 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rola B.Kwiatkowski T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
17
5
Break points saved·Clear edge
81
65
Break points won·Even
5
6
Deciding sets·Slight edge
6
1
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rola B.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kwiatkowski T.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
2.2
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
5.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Eubanks C.
Altmaier D.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[2]
Mmoh M.
3-66-36-4
Eubanks C.
Fratangelo B.[8]
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[2]
Sock J.[5]
3-67-57-62
Mmoh M.
Mchugh A.
3-66-36-1
Fratangelo B.[8]
Nava E.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.
Harrison C.
6-37-69
R16
Mmoh M.
Krueger M.[4]
7-641-66-2
Harrison C.
Jung J.
3-67-634-2
Nava E.
Polansky P.
2-67-620-0
Altmaier D.[2]
Rola B.
7-636-4
Sock J.[5]
Gunneswaran P.
6-37-61
Mchugh A.
Kozlov S.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.
Soeda G.
6-32-67-64
Fratangelo B.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-33-66-3
R32
Soeda G.
Jaziri M.
6-47-66
Harrison C.
Wolf J.[6]
6-26-3
Jung J.
Kubler J.
6-46-1
Rola B.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-37-65
Mmoh M.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-3
Altmaier D.[2]
Walton A.
6-36-2
Gunneswaran P.
Torpegaard M.
6-27-62
Sock J.[5]
Kovacevic A.
7-647-5
Krueger M.[4]
Ito T.
7-646-3
Kozlov S.
Vukic A.
6-34-67-5
Mchugh A.
Popko D.[7]
6-47-5
Eubanks C.
Pospisil V.[3]
2-66-26-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Watanuki Y.
6-47-65
Nava E.
Young D.
6-36-2
Polansky P.
Sandgren T.[1]
3-67-637-64
Brouwer G.
Aragone J.
5-76-27-5