Go Soeda vs Malek Jaziri — Knoxville CH Round of 32

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
TUN
Malek Jaziri
42 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Soeda G.
6-4 7-6
Jaziri M.
Soeda G.
6782
Jaziri M.
4660

Go Soeda defeated Malek Jaziri 6-4 7-6 in the Knoxville CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Malek Jaziri came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Go Soeda had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 8 on hard. Go Soeda claimed a first win over Malek Jaziri in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-01-16Australian OpenR128hardMalek Jaziri6-3 6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Soeda G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jaziri M.

Jaziri M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Soeda G.Jaziri M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
54%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (45 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Soeda G.Jaziri M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
23
31
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
83
Break points won·Slight edge
14
9
Deciding sets·Slight edge
46
55
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
26
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Soeda G.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jaziri M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.1
Surface form
3.8
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Eubanks C.
Altmaier D.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[2]
Mmoh M.
3-66-36-4
Eubanks C.
Fratangelo B.[8]
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[2]
Sock J.[5]
3-67-57-62
Mmoh M.
Mchugh A.
3-66-36-1
Fratangelo B.[8]
Nava E.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.
Harrison C.
6-37-69
R16
Mmoh M.
Krueger M.[4]
7-641-66-2
Harrison C.
Jung J.
3-67-634-2
Nava E.
Polansky P.
2-67-620-0
Altmaier D.[2]
Rola B.
7-636-4
Sock J.[5]
Gunneswaran P.
6-37-61
Mchugh A.
Kozlov S.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.
Soeda G.
6-32-67-64
Fratangelo B.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-33-66-3
R32
Soeda G.
Jaziri M.
6-47-66
Harrison C.
Wolf J.[6]
6-26-3
Jung J.
Kubler J.
6-46-1
Rola B.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-37-65
Mmoh M.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-3
Altmaier D.[2]
Walton A.
6-36-2
Gunneswaran P.
Torpegaard M.
6-27-62
Sock J.[5]
Kovacevic A.
7-647-5
Krueger M.[4]
Ito T.
7-646-3
Kozlov S.
Vukic A.
6-34-67-5
Mchugh A.
Popko D.[7]
6-47-5
Eubanks C.
Pospisil V.[3]
2-66-26-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Watanuki Y.
6-47-65
Nava E.
Young D.
6-36-2
Polansky P.
Sandgren T.[1]
3-67-637-64
Brouwer G.
Aragone J.
5-76-27-5