Christopher Eubanks vs Go Soeda — Knoxville CH Round of 16

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
JPN
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Eubanks C.
6-3 2-6 7-6
Soeda G.
Eubanks C.
62772
Soeda G.
36641

Christopher Eubanks defeated Go Soeda 6-3 2-6 7-6 in the Knoxville CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Eubanks C.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Soeda G.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Eubanks C.Soeda G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
59%
Return points won·Even
33%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.4
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 45). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Eubanks C.Soeda G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
23
Break points saved·Dominant
96
61
Break points won·Slight edge
3
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
67
46
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Eubanks C.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Soeda G.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.4
Surface form
2.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
7.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Eubanks C.
Altmaier D.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[2]
Mmoh M.
3-66-36-4
Eubanks C.
Fratangelo B.[8]
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[2]
Sock J.[5]
3-67-57-62
Mmoh M.
Mchugh A.
3-66-36-1
Fratangelo B.[8]
Nava E.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.
Harrison C.
6-37-69
R16
Mmoh M.
Krueger M.[4]
7-641-66-2
Harrison C.
Jung J.
3-67-634-2
Nava E.
Polansky P.
2-67-620-0
Altmaier D.[2]
Rola B.
7-636-4
Sock J.[5]
Gunneswaran P.
6-37-61
Mchugh A.
Kozlov S.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.
Soeda G.
6-32-67-64
Fratangelo B.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-33-66-3
R32
Soeda G.
Jaziri M.
6-47-66
Harrison C.
Wolf J.[6]
6-26-3
Jung J.
Kubler J.
6-46-1
Rola B.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-37-65
Mmoh M.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-3
Altmaier D.[2]
Walton A.
6-36-2
Gunneswaran P.
Torpegaard M.
6-27-62
Sock J.[5]
Kovacevic A.
7-647-5
Krueger M.[4]
Ito T.
7-646-3
Kozlov S.
Vukic A.
6-34-67-5
Mchugh A.
Popko D.[7]
6-47-5
Eubanks C.
Pospisil V.[3]
2-66-26-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Watanuki Y.
6-47-65
Nava E.
Young D.
6-36-2
Polansky P.
Sandgren T.[1]
3-67-637-64
Brouwer G.
Aragone J.
5-76-27-5