Bjorn Fratangelo vs Emilio Nava — Knoxville CH Quarter-final

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA8
Bjorn Fratangelo
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#86ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Fratangelo B.
6-4 6-4
Nava E.
Fratangelo B.
662
Nava E.
440

Bjorn Fratangelo defeated Emilio Nava 6-4 6-4 in the Knoxville CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Bjorn Fratangelo edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fratangelo B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Fratangelo B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fratangelo B.Nava E.
—
Serve
39
—
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fratangelo B.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
7.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fratangelo B.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
52
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
94
Break points won·Even
13
17
Deciding sets·Even
87
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fratangelo B.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nava E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
6.4
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fratangelo B.Nava E.
Freshness·
—
96

Nava E.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Eubanks C.
Altmaier D.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[2]
Mmoh M.
3-66-36-4
Eubanks C.
Fratangelo B.[8]
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[2]
Sock J.[5]
3-67-57-62
Mmoh M.
Mchugh A.
3-66-36-1
Fratangelo B.[8]
Nava E.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.
Harrison C.
6-37-69
R16
Mmoh M.
Krueger M.[4]
7-641-66-2
Harrison C.
Jung J.
3-67-634-2
Nava E.
Polansky P.
2-67-620-0
Altmaier D.[2]
Rola B.
7-636-4
Sock J.[5]
Gunneswaran P.
6-37-61
Mchugh A.
Kozlov S.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.
Soeda G.
6-32-67-64
Fratangelo B.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-33-66-3
R32
Soeda G.
Jaziri M.
6-47-66
Harrison C.
Wolf J.[6]
6-26-3
Jung J.
Kubler J.
6-46-1
Rola B.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-37-65
Mmoh M.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-3
Altmaier D.[2]
Walton A.
6-36-2
Gunneswaran P.
Torpegaard M.
6-27-62
Sock J.[5]
Kovacevic A.
7-647-5
Krueger M.[4]
Ito T.
7-646-3
Kozlov S.
Vukic A.
6-34-67-5
Mchugh A.
Popko D.[7]
6-47-5
Eubanks C.
Pospisil V.[3]
2-66-26-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Watanuki Y.
6-47-65
Nava E.
Young D.
6-36-2
Polansky P.
Sandgren T.[1]
3-67-637-64
Brouwer G.
Aragone J.
5-76-27-5