Emilio Nava vs Peter Polansky — Knoxville CH Round of 16

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 8 November 2021
hard
CAN
Peter Polansky
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Nava E.
2-6 7-6 0-0
Polansky P.
Nava E.
2770–
Polansky P.
6620–

Emilio Nava advanced when Peter Polansky retired 2-6 7-6 0-0 in the Knoxville CH round of 16.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Polansky P.

Polansky P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Polansky P.
39
Serve
—
21
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Polansky P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
4.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 43). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Polansky P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
82
Break points won·Slight edge
17
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
16
Tiebreaks·Even
23
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Polansky P.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
2.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
8.4
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Polansky P.
Freshness·
100
—

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Eubanks C.
Altmaier D.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[2]
Mmoh M.
3-66-36-4
Eubanks C.
Fratangelo B.[8]
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[2]
Sock J.[5]
3-67-57-62
Mmoh M.
Mchugh A.
3-66-36-1
Fratangelo B.[8]
Nava E.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.
Harrison C.
6-37-69
R16
Mmoh M.
Krueger M.[4]
7-641-66-2
Harrison C.
Jung J.
3-67-634-2
Nava E.
Polansky P.
2-67-620-0
Altmaier D.[2]
Rola B.
7-636-4
Sock J.[5]
Gunneswaran P.
6-37-61
Mchugh A.
Kozlov S.
6-46-4
Eubanks C.
Soeda G.
6-32-67-64
Fratangelo B.[8]
Brouwer G.
6-33-66-3
R32
Soeda G.
Jaziri M.
6-47-66
Harrison C.
Wolf J.[6]
6-26-3
Jung J.
Kubler J.
6-46-1
Rola B.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-37-65
Mmoh M.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-3
Altmaier D.[2]
Walton A.
6-36-2
Gunneswaran P.
Torpegaard M.
6-27-62
Sock J.[5]
Kovacevic A.
7-647-5
Krueger M.[4]
Ito T.
7-646-3
Kozlov S.
Vukic A.
6-34-67-5
Mchugh A.
Popko D.[7]
6-47-5
Eubanks C.
Pospisil V.[3]
2-66-26-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Watanuki Y.
6-47-65
Nava E.
Young D.
6-36-2
Polansky P.
Sandgren T.[1]
3-67-637-64
Brouwer G.
Aragone J.
5-76-27-5