Chun Hsin Tseng vs Corentin Denolly — Nur-Sultan 4 CH Round of 32

Nur-Sultan 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE7
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1495Hard ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
FRA
Corentin Denolly
#439ATP
1331ELO
1271Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLL
Tseng C.
6-4 6-4
Denolly C.
Tseng C.
662
Denolly C.
440

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Corentin Denolly 6-4 6-4 in the Nur-Sultan 4 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Chun Hsin Tseng edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Denolly C.

Denolly C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Serve advantage — Tseng C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Denolly C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Denolly C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
72
Break points won·Even
15
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
83
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Denolly C.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.6+224 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Hard Elo 1271
7.5Overall Elo 1554
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1331
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.8
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kuznetsov A.
Kubler J.
6-32-1
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Krutykh O.
6-16-3
Kuznetsov A.
Kotov P.
6-26-746-4
Quarter-finals
Kubler J.
Grenier H.[4]
7-646-1
Kuznetsov A.
Polansky P.[5]
6-23-66-2
Kotov P.
Peniston R.
6-46-2
Krutykh O.
Chappell N.
3-66-37-5
R16
Kubler J.
Tseng C.[7]
0-66-37-5
Chappell N.
Stakhovsky S.[2]
7-646-4
Krutykh O.
Basic M.
4-67-56-2
Polansky P.[5]
Jaziri M.
3-67-57-64
Kuznetsov A.
Zhukayev B.
6-27-5
Peniston R.
Hsu Y.
6-36-4
Kotov P.
De Jong J.[6]
6-37-63
Grenier H.[4]
Nedelko I.
6-5
R32
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Lock B.
6-33-67-5
Basic M.
Santillan A.
6-26-2
Krutykh O.
Wu T.[8]
6-26-2
Grenier H.[4]
Chung Y.
6-756-36-1
Kubler J.
Sultanov K.
6-37-5
Tseng C.[7]
Denolly C.
6-46-4
Jaziri M.
Zakharov A.
6-06-2
Zhukayev B.
Catarina L.
6-26-4
De Jong J.[6]
Yevseyev D.
4-66-06-3
Kotov P.
Leshem E.
3-66-16-4
Peniston R.
Kirkin E.
6-26-3
Chappell N.
Lomakin G.
6-37-63
Polansky P.[5]
Dubrivnyy A.
7-57-65
Nedelko I.
Tashbulatov D.
6-36-2
Kuznetsov A.
Clarke J.[3]
7-666-4
Hsu Y.
Bega A.
6-31-66-3