Jesper De Jong vs Denis Yevseyev — Nur-Sultan 4 CH Round of 32

Nur-Sultan 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jesper De Jong
NED6
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1607Hard ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
Denis Yevseyev
KAZ
Denis Yevseyev
#445ATP
1375ELO
1373Hard ELO
33 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWW
De Jong J.
4-6 6-0 6-3
Yevseyev D.
De Jong J.
4662
Yevseyev D.
6031

Jesper De Jong defeated Denis Yevseyev 4-6 6-0 6-3 in the Nur-Sultan 4 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Yevseyev D.

Yevseyev D.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve advantage — De Jong J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

De Jong J.Yevseyev D.
23
Serve
—
17
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Yevseyev D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Yevseyev D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
0
Break points saved·Dominant
90
15
Break points won·Clear edge
37
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
69
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
57
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Yevseyev D.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+234 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Hard Elo 1373
7.9Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1375
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
2.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
8.4
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Yevseyev D.
Freshness·Slight edge
78
68

De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d) · Yevseyev D.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kuznetsov A.
Kubler J.
6-32-1
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Krutykh O.
6-16-3
Kuznetsov A.
Kotov P.
6-26-746-4
Quarter-finals
Kubler J.
Grenier H.[4]
7-646-1
Kuznetsov A.
Polansky P.[5]
6-23-66-2
Kotov P.
Peniston R.
6-46-2
Krutykh O.
Chappell N.
3-66-37-5
R16
Kubler J.
Tseng C.[7]
0-66-37-5
Chappell N.
Stakhovsky S.[2]
7-646-4
Krutykh O.
Basic M.
4-67-56-2
Polansky P.[5]
Jaziri M.
3-67-57-64
Kuznetsov A.
Zhukayev B.
6-27-5
Peniston R.
Hsu Y.
6-36-4
Kotov P.
De Jong J.[6]
6-37-63
Grenier H.[4]
Nedelko I.
6-5
R32
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Lock B.
6-33-67-5
Basic M.
Santillan A.
6-26-2
Krutykh O.
Wu T.[8]
6-26-2
Grenier H.[4]
Chung Y.
6-756-36-1
Kubler J.
Sultanov K.
6-37-5
Tseng C.[7]
Denolly C.
6-46-4
Jaziri M.
Zakharov A.
6-06-2
Zhukayev B.
Catarina L.
6-26-4
De Jong J.[6]
Yevseyev D.
4-66-06-3
Kotov P.
Leshem E.
3-66-16-4
Peniston R.
Kirkin E.
6-26-3
Chappell N.
Lomakin G.
6-37-63
Polansky P.[5]
Dubrivnyy A.
7-57-65
Nedelko I.
Tashbulatov D.
6-36-2
Kuznetsov A.
Clarke J.[3]
7-666-4
Hsu Y.
Bega A.
6-31-66-3