Pavel Kotov vs Edan Leshem — Nur-Sultan 4 CH Round of 32

Nur-Sultan 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Pavel Kotov
RUS
Pavel Kotov
#246ATP
1597ELO
1601Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
ISR
Edan Leshem
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
Kotov P.
3-6 6-1 6-4
Leshem E.
Kotov P.
3662
Leshem E.
6141

Pavel Kotov defeated Edan Leshem 3-6 6-1 6-4 in the Nur-Sultan 4 CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Edan Leshem came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Pavel Kotov claimed a first win over Edan Leshem in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-06-12s HertogenboschQ1grassEdan Leshem6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kotov P.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Leshem E.

Leshem E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kotov P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kotov P.Leshem E.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 54). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kotov P.Leshem E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
1
Break points saved·Dominant
94
47
Break points won·Slight edge
13
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kotov P.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Leshem E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.2
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kuznetsov A.
Kubler J.
6-32-1
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Krutykh O.
6-16-3
Kuznetsov A.
Kotov P.
6-26-746-4
Quarter-finals
Kubler J.
Grenier H.[4]
7-646-1
Kuznetsov A.
Polansky P.[5]
6-23-66-2
Kotov P.
Peniston R.
6-46-2
Krutykh O.
Chappell N.
3-66-37-5
R16
Kubler J.
Tseng C.[7]
0-66-37-5
Chappell N.
Stakhovsky S.[2]
7-646-4
Krutykh O.
Basic M.
4-67-56-2
Polansky P.[5]
Jaziri M.
3-67-57-64
Kuznetsov A.
Zhukayev B.
6-27-5
Peniston R.
Hsu Y.
6-36-4
Kotov P.
De Jong J.[6]
6-37-63
Grenier H.[4]
Nedelko I.
6-5
R32
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Lock B.
6-33-67-5
Basic M.
Santillan A.
6-26-2
Krutykh O.
Wu T.[8]
6-26-2
Grenier H.[4]
Chung Y.
6-756-36-1
Kubler J.
Sultanov K.
6-37-5
Tseng C.[7]
Denolly C.
6-46-4
Jaziri M.
Zakharov A.
6-06-2
Zhukayev B.
Catarina L.
6-26-4
De Jong J.[6]
Yevseyev D.
4-66-06-3
Kotov P.
Leshem E.
3-66-16-4
Peniston R.
Kirkin E.
6-26-3
Chappell N.
Lomakin G.
6-37-63
Polansky P.[5]
Dubrivnyy A.
7-57-65
Nedelko I.
Tashbulatov D.
6-36-2
Kuznetsov A.
Clarke J.[3]
7-666-4
Hsu Y.
Bega A.
6-31-66-3