Pavel Kotov vs Ryan Peniston — Nur-Sultan 4 CH Quarter-final

Nur-Sultan 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Pavel Kotov
RUS
Pavel Kotov
#246ATP
1597ELO
1601Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Kotov P.
6-4 6-2
Peniston R.
Kotov P.
662
Peniston R.
420

Pavel Kotov defeated Ryan Peniston 6-4 6-2 in the Nur-Sultan 4 CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kotov P.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kotov P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kotov P.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kotov P.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
20
Break points saved·Dominant
94
60
Break points won·Clear edge
13
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kotov P.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Peniston R.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.8+199 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Hard Elo 1402
7.6Overall Elo 1597
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1441
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.1
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kuznetsov A.
Kubler J.
6-32-1
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Krutykh O.
6-16-3
Kuznetsov A.
Kotov P.
6-26-746-4
Quarter-finals
Kubler J.
Grenier H.[4]
7-646-1
Kuznetsov A.
Polansky P.[5]
6-23-66-2
Kotov P.
Peniston R.
6-46-2
Krutykh O.
Chappell N.
3-66-37-5
R16
Kubler J.
Tseng C.[7]
0-66-37-5
Chappell N.
Stakhovsky S.[2]
7-646-4
Krutykh O.
Basic M.
4-67-56-2
Polansky P.[5]
Jaziri M.
3-67-57-64
Kuznetsov A.
Zhukayev B.
6-27-5
Peniston R.
Hsu Y.
6-36-4
Kotov P.
De Jong J.[6]
6-37-63
Grenier H.[4]
Nedelko I.
6-5
R32
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Lock B.
6-33-67-5
Basic M.
Santillan A.
6-26-2
Krutykh O.
Wu T.[8]
6-26-2
Grenier H.[4]
Chung Y.
6-756-36-1
Kubler J.
Sultanov K.
6-37-5
Tseng C.[7]
Denolly C.
6-46-4
Jaziri M.
Zakharov A.
6-06-2
Zhukayev B.
Catarina L.
6-26-4
De Jong J.[6]
Yevseyev D.
4-66-06-3
Kotov P.
Leshem E.
3-66-16-4
Peniston R.
Kirkin E.
6-26-3
Chappell N.
Lomakin G.
6-37-63
Polansky P.[5]
Dubrivnyy A.
7-57-65
Nedelko I.
Tashbulatov D.
6-36-2
Kuznetsov A.
Clarke J.[3]
7-666-4
Hsu Y.
Bega A.
6-31-66-3