Carlos Alcaraz vs Lorenzo Musetti — Trieste CH Semi-final
Trieste CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
#3ATP
2162ELO
2102Clay ELO
$4.4MYTD
$65MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 August 2020
clay
#14ATP
1869ELO
1853Clay ELO
$961kYTD
$15MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWWL
Alcaraz C.7-5 2-6 6-3
Musetti L.
Alcaraz C.
7262
Musetti L.
5631
Carlos Alcaraz defeated Lorenzo Musetti 7-5 2-6 6-3 in the Trieste CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Carlos Alcaraz came in ranked #3, leading the head-to-head 7–1. Carlos Alcaraz extended the head-to-head to 8–1.
Key context
- Match story: Carlos Alcaraz closed it out in three sets, 7–5 2–6 6–3.
Head to head
7–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-09 | Tour Finals | RR | hard | Carlos Alcaraz | 6-4 6-1 |
| 2025-05-26 | Roland Garros | SF | clay | Carlos Alcaraz | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-0 2-0 RET |
| 2025-05-07 | Rome Masters | SF | clay | Carlos Alcaraz | 6-3 7-6(4) |
| 2025-04-07 | Monte Carlo Masters | F | clay | Carlos Alcaraz | 3-6 6-1 6-0 |
| 2024-03-18 | Miami Masters | R16 | hard | Carlos Alcaraz | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2023-09-27 | Beijing | R16 | hard | Carlos Alcaraz | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2023-05-29 | Roland Garros | R16 | clay | Carlos Alcaraz | 6-3 6-2 6-2 |
| 2022-07-18 | Hamburg | F | clay | Lorenzo Musetti | 6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Alcaraz C.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Serve & return on clay
Alcaraz C.Musetti L.
—
Serve
34
—
Return
—
Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
65%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
57%
53%
Service points won·Even
68%
64%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.1
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.1
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
98
89
Break points saved·Even
100
98
Break points won·Clear edge
99
82
Deciding sets·Even
100
99
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
100
95
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Quarter-finals
Bonadio R.
Marterer M.
2-67-56-4
Alcaraz C.
Etcheverry T.
7-626-3
Musetti L.
Ficovich J.
6-16-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Broady L.
6-796-46-4
R16
Bonadio R.
Cid R.
4-66-36-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Hanfmann Y.[3]
4-66-36-2
Broady L.
Kamke T.
7-676-2
Etcheverry T.
Moraing M.
6-36-4
Alcaraz C.
Viola M.
6-46-2
Ficovich J.
Gigante M.
6-26-4
Musetti L.
Popyrin A.[1]
7-56-3
Marterer M.
Collarini A.
7-697-66
R32
Cid R.
Blancaneaux G.
6-42-0
Collarini A.
Hoang A.[2]
1-66-26-4
Bonadio R.
Rodionov J.[7]
7-636-4
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Galovic V.
6-23-66-1
Vilella Martinez M.
Zeppieri G.
6-16-3
Moraing M.
Mena F.
6-06-1
Alcaraz C.
Bourgue M.
6-36-3
Viola M.
Giustino L.[4]
6-46-2
Ficovich J.
Lacko L.[8]
7-57-5
Musetti L.
Altmaier D.
6-36-2
Popyrin A.[1]
Halys Q.
6-47-63
Etcheverry T.
Giannessi A.[6]
6-34-66-1
Marterer M.
Gaston H.
6-16-2
Gigante M.
Baldi F.
6-26-2
Broady L.
Trungelliti M.
6-37-63
Kamke T.
Marcora R.[5]
6-46-2