Taylor Fritz vs Tommy Paul — Champaign CH Quarter-final

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Taylor Fritz
USA3
Taylor Fritz
#10ATP
1909ELO
1839Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$31MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 13 November 2017
hard
Tommy Paul
USA8
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Fritz T.
6-1 3-0
Paul T.
Fritz T.
63–
Paul T.
10–

Taylor Fritz advanced when Tommy Paul retired 6-1 3-0 in the Champaign CH quarter-final. Taylor Fritz extended the head-to-head to 4–3.

Head to head

3–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-16Delray BeachQFhardTommy Paul6-4 6-3
2024-02-12Delray BeachFhardTaylor Fritz6-2 6-3
2023-02-27AcapulcoSFhardTommy Paul6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(2)
2022-03-21Miami MastersR32hardTaylor Fritz7-6(2) 6-4
2021-11-08StockholmR16hardTommy Paul6-4 6-4
2021-10-25St. PetersburgR16carpetTaylor Fritz7-6(3) 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Fritz T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Paul T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Fritz T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fritz T.Paul T.
76
Serve
71
32
Return
54

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fritz T.Paul T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.5
6.2
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fritz T.Paul T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
87
93
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Dominant
60
87
Deciding sets·Even
98
98
Tiebreaks·Even
99
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Fritz T.Paul T.
Freshness·Clear edge
76
91

Fritz T.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d) · Paul T.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Smyczek T.[7]
Fratangelo B.[5]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Fratangelo B.[5]
Fritz T.[3]
3-66-36-2
Smyczek T.[7]
Norrie C.[4]
7-56-756-3
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.[3]
Paul T.[8]
6-13-0
Norrie C.[4]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-0
Smyczek T.[7]
Sandgren T.[1]
6-46-4
Fratangelo B.[5]
Peliwo F.
4-67-57-64
R16
Norrie C.[4]
Hiltzik J.
6-26-4
Fratangelo B.[5]
Klahn B.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Smith J.
7-57-65
Smyczek T.[7]
Nevolo D.
6-37-64
Sandgren T.[1]
Harrison C.
W/O
Paul T.[8]
Ymer M.
6-43-67-60
Fritz T.[3]
Schneider R.
6-46-3
Peliwo F.
Laaksonen H.[2]
6-37-5
R32
Laaksonen H.[2]
Moraing M.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Mmoh M.[6]
6-26-1
Fritz T.[3]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-1
Schneider R.
Santanna B.
4-66-36-1
Paul T.[8]
Koepfer D.
6-26-4
Smith J.
Giron M.
6-36-1
Hiltzik J.
Krueger M.
3-66-47-62
Norrie C.[4]
Vukic A.
6-26-3
Peliwo F.
Eubanks C.
7-53-66-3
Klahn B.
Scholtz N.
6-26-3
Smyczek T.[7]
Ward A.
6-47-64
Fratangelo B.[5]
Fanselow S.
3-67-606-1
Nevolo D.
Monette S.
4-66-46-0
Ymer M.
Rubin N.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.[1]
Hiltzik A.
6-16-716-0
Harrison C.
Corrie E.
3-66-46-4