Harry Wendelken vs Mark Lajal — Birmingham Round of 16

Birmingham · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GBRWC
Harry Wendelken
#202ATP
1551ELO
1470Grass ELO
24 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWL
0 — 2
Sets
Thursday, 4 June 2026 ·
grass
CENTRE COURT · 2nd on
ESTALT
Mark Lajal
#164ATP
1589ELO
1546Grass ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
Wendelken H.
4-6 1-6
Lajal M.
Wendelken H.
410
Lajal M.
662

Mark Lajal reeled off five straight games on the way to a 6-4 6-1 win over Harry Wendelken in the Birmingham round of 16.

Key context

  • Set 2, game 2: Mark Lajal broke serve.
  • Set 2, game 4: Harry Wendelken saved three break points to hold serve.
  • Pressure points: Harry Wendelken converted 1 of 3 break points; Mark Lajal converted 4 of 9 break points.

Pressure & serve by court

Wendelken H.
Lajal M.
Break points won
1/3
4/9
Break points saved
5/9
2/3

Break points from this match. Serve-by-court shows the share of service points won from each side of the court; the court side alternates every point.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wendelken H.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Lajal M.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wendelken H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wendelken H.Lajal M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
69%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
7.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wendelken H.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Lajal M.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.1Grass Elo 1431
Surface ELO
6.9+156 Grass Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1556
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1598
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0No prior meetings
5.05 of last 10 on grass
Surface form
7.98 of last 10 on grass
Fatigue & Travel
7.01 three-setter in 14 days
3-set count
Context
5.0Didn't play here last year
Defending pts
5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wendelken H.Lajal M.
Freshness·Slight edge
92
100

Wendelken H.: 9 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Lajal M.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
17°COvercast
Wind 25 km/hHumidity 54%
R32
R16
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final
Bellucci M.[1]
Bolt A.
3-60-6
Schoolkate T.
Fery A.
4-66-33-6
Mcdonald M.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-37-63
Fearnley J.
Hijikata R.[5]
1-66-73
Damm M.
Harris B.
6-26-736-73
Yunchaokete B.
Harris L.
7-651-66-1
Watt J.
Wendelken H.
4-67-656-73
Lajal M.
Riedi L.[8]
6-27-61
Wong C.[7]
Tarvet O.
7-657-610
Chidekh C.
Romano F.
6-34-64-6
Zhang Z.
Virtanen O.
6-781-6
Pinnington Jones J.
Vukic A.[4]
6-24-63-6
Shimabukuro S.[6]
Mochizuki S.
7-636-4
Ymer E.
C. O'Connell
7-676-3
Blanchet U.
Gill F.
7-656-724-6
Mccabe J.
Majchrzak K.[2]
6-733-6
Bolt A.
Fery A.
4-67-653-6
Mcdonald M.
Hijikata R.[5]
3-66-75
Harris B.
Yunchaokete B.
2-64-6
Wendelken H.
Lajal M.
4-61-6
Wong C.[7]
Romano F.
4-65-7
Virtanen O.
Vukic A.[4]
Shimabukuro S.[6]
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Gill F.
Majchrzak K.[2]
3-63-6
Fery A.
Hijikata R.[5]
7-676-3
Yunchaokete B.
Lajal M.
7-56-4
Romano F.
Virtanen O.
4-64-6
Shimabukuro S.[6]
Majchrzak K.[2]
6-763-6
Fery A.
Yunchaokete B.
2-66-33-6
Virtanen O.
Majchrzak K.[2]
7-666-757-67
Yunchaokete B.
Virtanen O.
2-67-636-3