Alex De Minaur vs Cameron Norrie — Monte Carlo Masters Round of 32

Monte Carlo Masters · ATP · Round of 32
Alex De Minaur
AUS5
Alex De Minaur
#6ATP
1961ELO
1869Clay ELO
$2.4MYTD
$25MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 5 April 2026
clay
Cameron Norrie
GBR
Cameron Norrie
#29ATP
1829ELO
1788Clay ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
De Minaur A.
7-6 2-6 6-2
Norrie C.
De Minaur A.
77262
Norrie C.
65621

Alex De Minaur defeated Cameron Norrie 7-6 2-6 6-2 in the Monte Carlo Masters round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Alex De Minaur came in ranked #6, defending last year's semi-final. Alex De Minaur narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Alex De Minaur closed it out in three sets, 7–6 2–6 6–2.

Head to head

2–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-03-04Indian Wells MastersR32hardCameron Norrie6-4 6-4
2024-01-01United CupRRhardCameron Norrie6-4 2-6 7-6(2)
2023-08-07Canada MastersR64hardAlex De Minaur7-5 6-4
2023-01-02United CupRRhardCameron Norrie6-3 6-3
2022-04-18BarcelonaQFclayAlex De Minaur6-3 5-7 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
De Minaur A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs De Minaur A.

Serve advantage — De Minaur A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Minaur A.Norrie C.
—
Serve
25
39
Return
38

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Minaur A.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
56%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
68%
68%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
5.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Minaur A.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
95
90
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Clear edge
97
83
Deciding sets·Even
97
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Minaur A.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Norrie C.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+82 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Clay Elo 1788
6.3Overall Elo 1961
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1829
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
8.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Minaur A.Norrie C.
Freshness·Clear edge
69
92

De Minaur A.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 72 games (7d) · Norrie C.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
19°CMainly clear
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 48%
Final
Sinner J.[2]
Alcaraz C.[1]
7-656-3
Semi-finals
Alcaraz C.[1]
Vacherot V.
6-46-4
Sinner J.[2]
Zverev A.[3]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Vacherot V.
De Minaur A.[5]
6-43-66-3
Sinner J.[2]
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
6-36-4
Alcaraz C.[1]
Bublik A.[8]
6-36-0
Zverev A.[3]
Fonseca J.
7-56-736-3
R16
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Ruud C.[9]
7-52-2
De Minaur A.[5]
Blockx A.
7-57-64
Fonseca J.
Berrettini M.
6-36-2
Vacherot V.
Hurkacz H.
6-746-36-4
Zverev A.[3]
Bergs Z.
6-27-5
Bublik A.[8]
Lehecka J.[11]
6-27-5
Alcaraz C.[1]
Etcheverry T.
6-14-66-3
Sinner J.[2]
Machac T.
6-16-736-3
R32
Blockx A.
Cobolli F.[10]
6-36-3
Machac T.
Cerundolo F.[16]
7-626-3
De Minaur A.[5]
Norrie C.
7-652-66-2
Lehecka J.[11]
Tabilo A.
4-67-646-3
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Cilic M.
7-646-3
Berrettini M.
Medvedev D.[7]
6-06-0
Bergs Z.
Rublev A.[13]
6-46-1
Bublik A.[8]
Monfils G.
6-46-4
Etcheverry T.
Atmane T.
3-66-36-2
Ruud C.[9]
Moutet C.
7-56-3
Hurkacz H.
Marozsan F.
6-26-3
Zverev A.[3]
Garin C.
4-66-47-5
Vacherot V.
Musetti L.[4]
7-667-5
Alcaraz C.[1]
Baez S.
6-16-3
Fonseca J.
Rinderknech A.
7-54-66-3
Sinner J.[2]
Humbert U.
6-36-0
R64
Berrettini M.
Bautista Agut R.
4-0
Rinderknech A.
Khachanov K.[12]
7-56-2
Moutet C.
Muller A.
6-46-1
Tabilo A.
Fucsovics M.
6-46-3
Cilic M.
Shevchenko A.
6-16-3
Hurkacz H.
Darderi L.[15]
7-645-76-1
Marozsan F.
Dzumhur D.
6-26-1
Baez S.
Wawrinka S.
7-57-5
Cobolli F.[10]
Comesana F.
7-52-66-3
Vacherot V.
Cerundolo J.
5-76-26-1
Cerundolo F.[16]
Tsitsipas S.
7-56-4
Fonseca J.
Diallo G.
6-26-3
Humbert U.
Kouame M.
6-37-5
Monfils G.
Griekspoor T.
6-776-16-4
Lehecka J.[11]
Nava E.
7-616-786-2
Ruud C.[9]
Popyrin A.
6-36-4
Rublev A.[13]
Borges N.
6-41-66-1
Norrie C.
Kecmanovic M.
6-24-67-60
Machac T.
Altmaier D.
6-41-66-3
Bergs Z.
Mannarino A.
6-46-3
Atmane T.
Quinn E.
6-16-4
Blockx A.
Shapovalov D.
6-44-66-3
Garin C.
Arnaldi M.
6-26-4
Etcheverry T.
Dimitrov G.
6-42-66-3