Alex De Minaur vs Cameron Norrie — Barcelona Quarter-final

Barcelona · ATP · Quarter-final
Alex De Minaur
AUS10
Alex De Minaur
#6ATP
1961ELO
1869Clay ELO
$2.4MYTD
$25MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 April 2022
clay
Cameron Norrie
GBR4
Cameron Norrie
#29ATP
1829ELO
1788Clay ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
De Minaur A.
6-3 5-7 6-1
Norrie C.
De Minaur A.
6562
Norrie C.
3711

Alex De Minaur defeated Cameron Norrie 6-3 5-7 6-1 in the Barcelona quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Alex De Minaur came in ranked #6, defending last year's round of 16. Alex De Minaur narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Alex De Minaur came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–3 5–7 6–1.

Head to head

2–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-04-05Monte Carlo MastersR32clayAlex De Minaur7-6(5) 2-6 6-2
2026-03-04Indian Wells MastersR32hardCameron Norrie6-4 6-4
2024-01-01United CupRRhardCameron Norrie6-4 2-6 7-6(2)
2023-08-07Canada MastersR64hardAlex De Minaur7-5 6-4
2023-01-02United CupRRhardCameron Norrie6-3 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
De Minaur A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs De Minaur A.

Serve advantage — De Minaur A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Minaur A.Norrie C.
—
Serve
25
39
Return
38

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Minaur A.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
5.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Minaur A.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
95
89
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Clear edge
97
83
Deciding sets·Even
97
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Minaur A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Norrie C.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+82 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Clay Elo 1788
6.3Overall Elo 1961
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1829
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
6.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Minaur A.Norrie C.
Freshness·Clear edge
73
93

De Minaur A.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 72 games (7d) · Norrie C.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
18°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 64%
Final
Alcaraz C.[5]
Carreno Busta P.[8]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Alcaraz C.[5]
De Minaur A.[10]
6-747-646-4
Carreno Busta P.[8]
Schwartzman D.[6]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Alcaraz C.[5]
Tsitsipas S.[1]
6-45-76-2
De Minaur A.[10]
Norrie C.[4]
6-35-76-1
Schwartzman D.[6]
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
3-66-26-3
Carreno Busta P.[8]
Ruud C.[2]
4-67-686-3
R16
De Minaur A.[10]
Harris L.
6-00-0
Tsitsipas S.[1]
Dimitrov G.[14]
6-16-4
Alcaraz C.[5]
Munar J.
6-36-3
Norrie C.[4]
Fucsovics M.
7-56-796-4
Schwartzman D.[6]
Musetti L.
6-47-5
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Tiafoe F.[13]
7-56-4
Carreno Busta P.[8]
Sonego L.[11]
6-25-76-2
Ruud C.[2]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-2
R32
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Taberner C.
6-13-66-4
Tiafoe F.[13]
Dellien H.
7-636-1
Tsitsipas S.[1]
Ivashka I.
6-14-66-2
Dimitrov G.[14]
Coria F.
4-66-36-4
Munar J.
Basilashvili N.[9]
6-16-4
Alcaraz C.[5]
Kwon S.
6-12-66-2
Norrie C.[4]
Gerasimov E.
5-76-46-4
Fucsovics M.
Delbonis F.[15]
6-26-1
De Minaur A.[10]
Humbert U.
6-34-66-3
Harris L.
Ramos A.[17]
6-36-4
Schwartzman D.[6]
Mcdonald M.
6-26-2
Musetti L.
Evans D.[12]
6-47-68
Carreno Busta P.[8]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-3
Sonego L.[11]
Ymer E.
6-46-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Bublik A.[16]
6-36-1
Ruud C.[2]
Nakashima B.
6-36-2
R64
Zapata Miralles B.
Robredo T.
6-16-1
Ymer E.
Cressy M.
6-36-0
Coria F.
Giron M.
6-23-66-1
Harris L.
Carballes Baena R.
6-47-60
Ivashka I.
Martinez P.
6-47-64
Munar J.
Moroni G.
6-26-4
Kwon S.
Paire B.
6-46-4
Gerasimov E.
Mannarino A.
2-66-36-4
Fucsovics M.
Thompson J.
6-46-2
Humbert U.
Andujar P.
6-46-3
Mcdonald M.
Grenier H.
6-726-17-62
Musetti L.
Baez S.
7-57-5
Dellien H.
Guinard M.
6-47-5
Taberner C.
Korda S.
6-36-0
Ruusuvuori E.
Lopez F.
6-06-1
Nakashima B.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-666-3