Kimmer Coppejans vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Bunschoten CH Round of 32

Bunschoten CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
clay
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Coppejans K.
1-6 7-5 6-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Coppejans K.
1762
Reis Da Silva J.
6541

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 1-6 7-5 6-4 in the Bunschoten CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Reis Da Silva J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
44
12
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
49
Break points won·Clear edge
29
43
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Reis Da Silva J.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.5+43 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Clay Elo 1470
5.8Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1486
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.2
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
5.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Reis Da Silva J.
Freshness·
76
—

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.[5]
Coppejans K.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Choinski J.[5]
Den Ouden G.[2]
7-655-76-2
Coppejans K.
Barrena A.
3-66-27-64
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.
Kicker N.
7-54-66-0
Den Ouden G.[2]
Onclin G.[6]
6-26-3
Barrena A.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Choinski J.[5]
Hassan B.[3]
6-26-2
R16
Hassan B.[3]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-11-66-0
Kicker N.
Moeller M.
7-56-4
Blancaneaux G.
Bondioli F.
7-643-67-5
Onclin G.[6]
Houkes M.
6-47-5
Den Ouden G.[2]
Erhard M.
6-46-3
Choinski J.[5]
Dodig M.
6-47-5
Coppejans K.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
7-647-5
Barrena A.
Droguet T.[4]
2-66-27-5
R32
Moeller M.
Piros Z.[1]
6-37-64
Barrena A.
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Hassan B.[3]
Rottgering M.
6-46-4
Houkes M.
Geerts M.
6-46-4
Kicker N.
Sels J.
7-627-5
Blancaneaux G.
Tabur C.[7]
7-657-617
Bondioli F.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-47-68
Den Ouden G.[2]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-33-66-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Krumich M.
6-33-66-3
Onclin G.[6]
Giustino L.
7-56-2
Erhard M.
Forger A.
6-46-726-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Gakhov I.
7-614-66-4
Choinski J.[5]
Balciunas M.
6-16-2
Droguet T.[4]
Matusevich A.
6-36-1
Dodig M.
Slump S.
4-66-46-3
Coppejans K.
Reis Da Silva J.
1-67-56-4