Matej Dodig vs Stijn Slump — Bunschoten CH Round of 32

Bunschoten CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CRO
Matej Dodig
#254ATP
1461ELO
1430Clay ELO
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
clay
NED
Stijn Slump
#928ATP
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLLL
Dodig M.
4-6 6-4 6-3
Slump S.
Dodig M.
4662
Slump S.
6431

Matej Dodig defeated Stijn Slump 4-6 6-4 6-3 in the Bunschoten CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dodig M.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Slump S.

Slump S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Dodig M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Dodig M.Slump S.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Clear edge
60%
47%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
6.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Dodig M.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Slump S.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.6
Surface form
2.5
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
1.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Dodig M.Slump S.
Freshness·
53
—

Dodig M.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 110 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.[5]
Coppejans K.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Choinski J.[5]
Den Ouden G.[2]
7-655-76-2
Coppejans K.
Barrena A.
3-66-27-64
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.
Kicker N.
7-54-66-0
Den Ouden G.[2]
Onclin G.[6]
6-26-3
Barrena A.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Choinski J.[5]
Hassan B.[3]
6-26-2
R16
Hassan B.[3]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-11-66-0
Kicker N.
Moeller M.
7-56-4
Blancaneaux G.
Bondioli F.
7-643-67-5
Onclin G.[6]
Houkes M.
6-47-5
Den Ouden G.[2]
Erhard M.
6-46-3
Choinski J.[5]
Dodig M.
6-47-5
Coppejans K.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
7-647-5
Barrena A.
Droguet T.[4]
2-66-27-5
R32
Moeller M.
Piros Z.[1]
6-37-64
Barrena A.
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Hassan B.[3]
Rottgering M.
6-46-4
Houkes M.
Geerts M.
6-46-4
Kicker N.
Sels J.
7-627-5
Blancaneaux G.
Tabur C.[7]
7-657-617
Bondioli F.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-47-68
Den Ouden G.[2]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-33-66-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Krumich M.
6-33-66-3
Onclin G.[6]
Giustino L.
7-56-2
Erhard M.
Forger A.
6-46-726-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Gakhov I.
7-614-66-4
Choinski J.[5]
Balciunas M.
6-16-2
Droguet T.[4]
Matusevich A.
6-36-1
Dodig M.
Slump S.
4-66-46-3
Coppejans K.
Reis Da Silva J.
1-67-56-4