Kimmer Coppejans vs Nicolas Kicker — Bunschoten CH Quarter-final

Bunschoten CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
clay
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Coppejans K.
7-5 4-6 6-0
Kicker N.
Coppejans K.
7462
Kicker N.
5601

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Nicolas Kicker 7-5 4-6 6-0 in the Bunschoten CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Kicker N.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Kicker N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
43%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
1.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Kicker N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
44
30
Break points saved·Slight edge
67
56
Break points won·Clear edge
29
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
30
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
43
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Kicker N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+140 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Clay Elo 1373
7.3Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1385
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
5.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Kicker N.
Freshness·Dominant
72
100

Coppejans K.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Kicker N.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.[5]
Coppejans K.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Choinski J.[5]
Den Ouden G.[2]
7-655-76-2
Coppejans K.
Barrena A.
3-66-27-64
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.
Kicker N.
7-54-66-0
Den Ouden G.[2]
Onclin G.[6]
6-26-3
Barrena A.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Choinski J.[5]
Hassan B.[3]
6-26-2
R16
Hassan B.[3]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-11-66-0
Kicker N.
Moeller M.
7-56-4
Blancaneaux G.
Bondioli F.
7-643-67-5
Onclin G.[6]
Houkes M.
6-47-5
Den Ouden G.[2]
Erhard M.
6-46-3
Choinski J.[5]
Dodig M.
6-47-5
Coppejans K.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
7-647-5
Barrena A.
Droguet T.[4]
2-66-27-5
R32
Moeller M.
Piros Z.[1]
6-37-64
Barrena A.
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Hassan B.[3]
Rottgering M.
6-46-4
Houkes M.
Geerts M.
6-46-4
Kicker N.
Sels J.
7-627-5
Blancaneaux G.
Tabur C.[7]
7-657-617
Bondioli F.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-47-68
Den Ouden G.[2]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-33-66-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Krumich M.
6-33-66-3
Onclin G.[6]
Giustino L.
7-56-2
Erhard M.
Forger A.
6-46-726-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Gakhov I.
7-614-66-4
Choinski J.[5]
Balciunas M.
6-16-2
Droguet T.[4]
Matusevich A.
6-36-1
Dodig M.
Slump S.
4-66-46-3
Coppejans K.
Reis Da Silva J.
1-67-56-4