Marvin Moeller vs Zsombor Piros — Bunschoten CH Round of 32

Bunschoten CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marvin Moeller
GER
Marvin Moeller
#314ATP
1396ELO
1383Clay ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
clay
Zsombor Piros
HUN1
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Moeller M.
6-3 7-6
Piros Z.
Moeller M.
6772
Piros Z.
3640

Marvin Moeller defeated Zsombor Piros 6-3 7-6 in the Bunschoten CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Moeller M.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Moeller M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Moeller M.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
54%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
64%
Aces / match·Even
2.8
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (24 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moeller M.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
48
57
Break points saved·Dominant
43
84
Break points won·Clear edge
44
32
Deciding sets·Clear edge
73
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Moeller M.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 315 days (−1.5)
Piros Z.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
8.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Moeller M.Piros Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
70
54

Moeller M.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 60 games (7d) · Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.[5]
Coppejans K.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Choinski J.[5]
Den Ouden G.[2]
7-655-76-2
Coppejans K.
Barrena A.
3-66-27-64
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.
Kicker N.
7-54-66-0
Den Ouden G.[2]
Onclin G.[6]
6-26-3
Barrena A.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Choinski J.[5]
Hassan B.[3]
6-26-2
R16
Hassan B.[3]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-11-66-0
Kicker N.
Moeller M.
7-56-4
Blancaneaux G.
Bondioli F.
7-643-67-5
Onclin G.[6]
Houkes M.
6-47-5
Den Ouden G.[2]
Erhard M.
6-46-3
Choinski J.[5]
Dodig M.
6-47-5
Coppejans K.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
7-647-5
Barrena A.
Droguet T.[4]
2-66-27-5
R32
Moeller M.
Piros Z.[1]
6-37-64
Barrena A.
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Hassan B.[3]
Rottgering M.
6-46-4
Houkes M.
Geerts M.
6-46-4
Kicker N.
Sels J.
7-627-5
Blancaneaux G.
Tabur C.[7]
7-657-617
Bondioli F.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-47-68
Den Ouden G.[2]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-33-66-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Krumich M.
6-33-66-3
Onclin G.[6]
Giustino L.
7-56-2
Erhard M.
Forger A.
6-46-726-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Gakhov I.
7-614-66-4
Choinski J.[5]
Balciunas M.
6-16-2
Droguet T.[4]
Matusevich A.
6-36-1
Dodig M.
Slump S.
4-66-46-3
Coppejans K.
Reis Da Silva J.
1-67-56-4