Jessica Pegula vs Magdalena Frech — Stuttgart Round of 16

Stuttgart · WTA · Round of 16
Jessica Pegula
USA3
Jessica Pegula
#4WTA
2097ELO
1941Clay ELO
$2.8MYTD
$25MCAREER
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 April 2025
clay
Magdalena Frech
POL
Magdalena Frech
#44WTA
1725ELO
1648Clay ELO
$659kYTD
$4.8MCAREER
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
Pegula J.
6-1 6-1
Frech M.
Pegula J.
662
Frech M.
110

Jessica Pegula defeated Magdalena Frech 6-1 6-1 in the Stuttgart round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jessica Pegula came in ranked #4, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Jessica Pegula extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-04-24MadridR64clayJessica Pegula7-6(5) 6-3
2021-09-27Chicago 2R64hardJessica Pegula6-3 6-0
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Pegula J.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Frech M.

Frech M.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Pegula J.

Serve advantage — Pegula J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Pegula J.Frech M.
67
Serve
—
22
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Pegula J.Frech M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
56%
Return points won·Even
45%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
54%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (96 vs 57). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pegula J.Frech M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
96
55
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
76
Break points won·Dominant
99
71
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
72
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pegula J.
8.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Frech M.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 27 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
8.5+294 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.5Clay Elo 1648
9.5Overall Elo 2097
ELO gap
0.5Overall Elo 1725
10.0
H2H
0.0
9.1
Surface form
5.2
10.08-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Pegula J.Frech M.
Freshness·Clear edge
76
98

Pegula J.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 54 games (7d) · Frech M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
15°COvercast
Wind 9 km/hHumidity 70%

Draw

Final
Ostapenko J.
Sabalenka A.[1]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Sabalenka A.[1]
Paolini J.[5]
7-56-4
Ostapenko J.
Alexandrova E.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Sabalenka A.[1]
Mertens E.
6-46-1
Paolini J.[5]
Gauff C.[4]
6-46-3
Alexandrova E.
Pegula J.[3]
6-06-4
Ostapenko J.
Swiatek I.[2]
6-33-66-2
R16
Sabalenka A.[1]
Potapova A.
W/O
Swiatek I.[2]
Fett J.
6-26-2
Gauff C.[4]
Seidel E.
6-16-1
Mertens E.
Shnaider D.[8]
6-27-65
Paolini J.[5]
Niemeier J.
6-17-5
Alexandrova E.
Andreeva M.[6]
6-36-2
Pegula J.[3]
Frech M.
6-16-1
Ostapenko J.
Navarro E.[7]
7-53-66-2
R32
Andreeva M.[6]
Andreeva E.
6-21-0
Ostapenko J.
Yastremska D.
6-33-0
Fett J.
Vekic D.
7-626-4
Seidel E.
Maria T.
3-67-626-4
Niemeier J.
Siegemund L.
4-66-36-4
Frech M.
Errani S.
7-54-67-65
Potapova A.
Tauson C.
2-67-686-3
Mertens E.
Sasnovich A.
7-636-2
Shnaider D.[8]
Kudermetova V.
5-76-26-3
Paolini J.[5]
Lys E.
6-26-1
Alexandrova E.
Samsonova L.
6-36-3
Navarro E.[7]
Haddad Maia B.
6-36-0