Jessica Pegula vs Magdalena Frech — Chicago 2 Round of 64

Chicago 2 · WTA · Round of 64
Jessica Pegula
USA9
Jessica Pegula
#3WTA
2097ELO
2058Hard ELO
$2.8MYTD
$25MCAREER
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 September 2021
hard
Magdalena Frech
POL
Magdalena Frech
#44WTA
1725ELO
1700Hard ELO
$659kYTD
$4.8MCAREER
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
Pegula J.
6-3 6-0
Frech M.
Pegula J.
662
Frech M.
300

Jessica Pegula defeated Magdalena Frech 6-3 6-0 in the Chicago 2 round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jessica Pegula came in ranked #3, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Jessica Pegula extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-04-14StuttgartR16clayJessica Pegula6-1 6-1
2023-04-24MadridR64clayJessica Pegula7-6(5) 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Pegula J.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Frech M.

Frech M.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Pegula J.

Serve advantage — Pegula J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Pegula J.Frech M.
68
Serve
32
73
Return
47

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Pegula J.Frech M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
43%
Break points saved·Even
58%
54%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
2.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pegula J.Frech M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
96
55
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
76
Break points won·Dominant
99
71
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
72
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pegula J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 42 days (−1.0)
Frech M.
2.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
9.4+358 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.6Hard Elo 1700
9.5Overall Elo 2097
ELO gap
0.5Overall Elo 1725
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
3.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Pegula J.Frech M.
Freshness·Clear edge
79
98

Pegula J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d) · Frech M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Muguruza G.[2]
Jabeur O.[6]
3-66-36-0
Semi-finals
Jabeur O.[6]
Rybakina E.[5]
6-43-2
Muguruza G.[2]
Vondrousova M.
W/O
Quarter-finals
Vondrousova M.
Collins D.[10]
6-746-07-63
Jabeur O.[6]
Svitolina E.[1]
6-46-2
Muguruza G.[2]
Hontama M.
6-36-2
Rybakina E.[5]
Bencic B.[3]
6-43-1
R16
Muguruza G.[2]
Azarenka V.[14]
W/O
Svitolina E.[1]
Ruse E.
6-36-3
Jabeur O.[6]
Pegula J.[9]
1-66-26-3
Bencic B.[3]
Martincova T.
6-27-65
Rybakina E.[5]
Kudermetova V.[12]
7-647-5
Collins D.[10]
Mertens E.[7]
6-26-4
Vondrousova M.
Teichmann J.[16]
6-46-3
Hontama M.
Rogers S.
6-46-716-1
R32
Vondrousova M.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[4]
6-36-2
Teichmann J.[16]
Linette M.
6-26-4
Hontama M.
Kontaveit A.[11]
W/O
Svitolina E.[1]
Anisimova A.
6-46-3
Ruse E.
Baindl K.
7-56-2
Pegula J.[9]
Petkovic A.
6-27-5
Jabeur O.[6]
Hsieh S.
6-16-0
Bencic B.[3]
Inglis M.
5-76-16-0
Martincova T.
Zidansek T.[13]
6-27-5
Kudermetova V.[12]
Dart H.
6-36-4
Rybakina E.[5]
Sasnovich A.
6-46-4
Mertens E.[7]
Yastremska D.
6-16-3
Collins D.[10]
Doi M.
4-66-37-5
Rogers S.
Andreescu B.[8]
6-47-5
Azarenka V.[14]
Baptiste H.
6-24-66-3
Muguruza G.[2]
Li A.
6-46-4
R64
Baindl K.
Kostyuk M.
6-726-36-0
Doi M.
Bouzkova M.
6-36-746-3
Sasnovich A.
Keys M.
6-42-0
Hsieh S.
Clijsters K.
6-35-76-3
Petkovic A.
Govortsova O.
6-26-2
Vondrousova M.
Tomljanovic A.
6-26-1
Hontama M.
Garcia C.
6-36-0
Teichmann J.[16]
Kanepi K.
7-637-5
Ruse E.
Giorgi C.[15]
6-46-2
Anisimova A.
Golubic V.
6-05-76-4
Pegula J.[9]
Frech M.
6-36-0
Collins D.[10]
Flipkens K.
6-46-2
Inglis M.
Dolehide C.
4-66-26-4
Zidansek T.[13]
Stephens S.
6-26-1
Dart H.
Haddad Maia B.
6-13-66-1
Linette M.
Vandeweghe C.
6-16-4
Rogers S.
Cabrera L.
6-26-1
Kontaveit A.[11]
Brengle M.
6-46-3
Azarenka V.[14]
Zhang S.
6-26-1
Baptiste H.
Paolini J.
7-56-3
Li A.
Vekic D.
6-36-1
Kudermetova V.[12]
Kalinskaya A.
7-684-66-2
Martincova T.
Osorio C.
6-37-5
Yastremska D.
Cornet A.
7-56-1