Anna Bondar vs Maddison Inglis — Miami Qualifying Round 1

Miami · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Anna Bondar
HUN
Anna Bondar
#74WTA
1735ELO
1654Hard ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Tuesday, 18 March 2025
hard
Maddison Inglis
AUS
Maddison Inglis
#149WTA
1590ELO
1558Hard ELO
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Bondar A.
3-6 6-3 6-2
Inglis M.
Bondar A.
3662
Inglis M.
6321

Anna Bondar defeated Maddison Inglis 3-6 6-3 6-2 in the Miami qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Anna Bondar came in ranked #74.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bondar A.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Inglis M.

Inglis M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Bondar A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bondar A.Inglis M.
32
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bondar A.Inglis M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
43%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.1
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bondar A.Inglis M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
22
Break points saved·Dominant
88
50
Break points won·Dominant
77
25
Deciding sets·Slight edge
27
36
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
78
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bondar A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Inglis M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.4+96 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.6Hard Elo 1558
7.3Overall Elo 1735
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1590
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.4
Surface form
6.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bondar A.Inglis M.
Freshness·Even
96
100

Bondar A.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Inglis M.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Bondar A.
Begu I.
6-32-67-65
Liu C.
Sorribes Tormo S.
7-646-3
Birrell K.
Dart H.
6-46-3
Ruse E.
Shibahara E.
4-66-17-5
Ito A.
Lys E.
4-66-46-2
Stefanini L.
Bonaventure Y.
6-36-1
Pera B.
Montgomery R.
7-626-4
Townsend T.
Kartal S.
4-67-627-5
Fruhvirtova L.
Siegemund L.
6-16-2
Masarova R.
Joint M.
6-17-63
Starodubtseva Y.
Maria T.
6-46-3
Minnen G.
Kostovic T.
6-27-69
Q1
Ito A.
Efremova K.
6-26-3
Liu C.
Dolehide C.
2-67-626-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Tagger L.
6-716-16-1
Begu I.
Sonobe W.
6-36-1
Bondar A.
Inglis M.
3-66-36-2
Birrell K.
Sasnovich A.
6-46-3
Dart H.
Saville D.
2-66-17-5
Shibahara E.
Sonmez Z.
6-31-66-1
Ruse E.
Bjorklund M.
2-66-46-3
Lys E.
Martic P.
7-56-3
Bonaventure Y.
Chirico L.
6-43-0
Stefanini L.
Bucsa C.
6-41-66-3
Pera B.
Stakusic M.
5-76-46-4
Montgomery R.
Pedone G.
6-26-0
Kartal S.
Burrage J.
6-756-40-0
Townsend T.
Branstine C.
6-26-4
Siegemund L.
Konjuh A.
6-26-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Marino R.
6-36-3
Joint M.
Errani S.
7-667-64
Masarova R.
Sawangkaew M.
3-66-46-2
Maria T.
Jeanjean L.
6-26-2
Starodubtseva Y.
Lepchenko V.
5-76-16-1
Minnen G.
Niemeier J.
7-56-1
Kostovic T.
Gadecki O.
6-37-5