Laura Siegemund vs Ana Konjuh — Miami Qualifying Round 1

Miami · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Laura Siegemund
GER
Laura Siegemund
#87WTA
1769ELO
1713Hard ELO
$736kYTD
$8.8MCAREER
38 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 18 March 2025
hard
Ana Konjuh
CRO
Ana Konjuh
#932WTA
28 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
Siegemund L.
6-2 6-3
Konjuh A.
Siegemund L.
662
Konjuh A.
23–

Laura Siegemund defeated Ana Konjuh 6-2 6-3 in the Miami qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Laura Siegemund came in ranked #87.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Siegemund L.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Konjuh A.

Konjuh A.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Siegemund L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Siegemund L.Konjuh A.
11
Serve
—
46
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Siegemund L.Konjuh A.
1st serve in·Clear edge
73%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
40%
Service points won·Even
56%
56%
Return points won·Even
43%
42%
Break points saved·Even
53%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.0
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (51 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Siegemund L.Konjuh A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
64
32
Break points saved·Dominant
80
51
Break points won·Dominant
89
63
Deciding sets·Clear edge
76
58
Tiebreaks·Even
33
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Siegemund L.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Konjuh A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
2.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Siegemund L.Konjuh A.
Freshness·
98
—

Siegemund L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Bondar A.
Begu I.
6-32-67-65
Liu C.
Sorribes Tormo S.
7-646-3
Birrell K.
Dart H.
6-46-3
Ruse E.
Shibahara E.
4-66-17-5
Ito A.
Lys E.
4-66-46-2
Stefanini L.
Bonaventure Y.
6-36-1
Pera B.
Montgomery R.
7-626-4
Townsend T.
Kartal S.
4-67-627-5
Fruhvirtova L.
Siegemund L.
6-16-2
Masarova R.
Joint M.
6-17-63
Starodubtseva Y.
Maria T.
6-46-3
Minnen G.
Kostovic T.
6-27-69
Q1
Ito A.
Efremova K.
6-26-3
Liu C.
Dolehide C.
2-67-626-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Tagger L.
6-716-16-1
Begu I.
Sonobe W.
6-36-1
Bondar A.
Inglis M.
3-66-36-2
Birrell K.
Sasnovich A.
6-46-3
Dart H.
Saville D.
2-66-17-5
Shibahara E.
Sonmez Z.
6-31-66-1
Ruse E.
Bjorklund M.
2-66-46-3
Lys E.
Martic P.
7-56-3
Bonaventure Y.
Chirico L.
6-43-0
Stefanini L.
Bucsa C.
6-41-66-3
Pera B.
Stakusic M.
5-76-46-4
Montgomery R.
Pedone G.
6-26-0
Kartal S.
Burrage J.
6-756-40-0
Townsend T.
Branstine C.
6-26-4
Siegemund L.
Konjuh A.
6-26-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Marino R.
6-36-3
Joint M.
Errani S.
7-667-64
Masarova R.
Sawangkaew M.
3-66-46-2
Maria T.
Jeanjean L.
6-26-2
Starodubtseva Y.
Lepchenko V.
5-76-16-1
Minnen G.
Niemeier J.
7-56-1
Kostovic T.
Gadecki O.
6-37-5