Arthur Cazaux vs Li Tu — San Diego CH Round of 32

San Diego CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Arthur Cazaux
FRA1
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Cazaux A.
6-3 6-4
Tu L.
Cazaux A.
662
Tu L.
340

Arthur Cazaux defeated Li Tu 6-3 6-4 in the San Diego CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98.

Key context

  • Match story: Arthur Cazaux closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Tu L.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Tu L.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
59%
Aces / match·Even
8.2
8.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
27
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
82
Break points won·Clear edge
27
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
20
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
70
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Tu L.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+267 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Hard Elo 1471
8.3Overall Elo 1793
ELO gap
1.7Overall Elo 1488
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Spizzirri E.
Mcdonald M.[4]
6-42-66-4
Semi-finals
Spizzirri E.
Quinn E.[8]
6-34-66-3
Mcdonald M.[4]
Majchrzak K.[5]
3-66-16-1
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[5]
Bolt A.
7-621-1
Quinn E.[8]
Cazaux A.[1]
7-56-716-4
Spizzirri E.
Daniel T.[6]
6-726-06-4
Mcdonald M.[4]
Svajda T.
6-36-4
R16
Cazaux A.[1]
Lestienne C.
7-56-4
Quinn E.[8]
Brooksby J.
6-35-77-65
Mcdonald M.[4]
Gigante M.
6-37-5
Majchrzak K.[5]
Mmoh M.
7-57-5
Daniel T.[6]
Rybakov A.
7-697-61
Svajda T.
Krueger M.[7]
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Nanda G.
6-46-3
Spizzirri E.
Martin A.
1-66-16-4
R32
Brooksby J.
Wong C.
6-26-4
Quinn E.[8]
Perez A.
6-47-63
Martin A.
Svajda Z.
6-43-66-3
Spizzirri E.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-1
Daniel T.[6]
Zink T.
6-46-4
Svajda T.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-37-64
Mcdonald M.[4]
Sell K.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.[5]
Smith C.
7-636-4
Mmoh M.
Bicknell B.
2-67-646-4
Nanda G.
Atmane T.
7-654-67-5
Bolt A.
Boyer T.[2]
6-37-64
Rybakov A.
Albot R.
7-626-3
Gigante M.
Murali R.
6-26-4
Krueger M.[7]
Andrade A.
6-43-66-1
Cazaux A.[1]
Tu L.
6-36-4
Lestienne C.
Dostanic S.
6-36-4