Arthur Cazaux vs Constant Lestienne — San Diego CH Round of 16

San Diego CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Arthur Cazaux
FRA1
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
FRA
Constant Lestienne
#1261ATP
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Cazaux A.
7-5 6-4
Lestienne C.
Cazaux A.
762
Lestienne C.
540

Arthur Cazaux defeated Constant Lestienne 7-5 6-4 in the San Diego CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lestienne C.

Lestienne C.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Lestienne C.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Lestienne C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Clear edge
68%
52%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Lestienne C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
65
41
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
86
Break points won·Clear edge
27
39
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
26
Tiebreaks·Even
70
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lestienne C.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.6
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
6.5
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Spizzirri E.
Mcdonald M.[4]
6-42-66-4
Semi-finals
Spizzirri E.
Quinn E.[8]
6-34-66-3
Mcdonald M.[4]
Majchrzak K.[5]
3-66-16-1
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[5]
Bolt A.
7-621-1
Quinn E.[8]
Cazaux A.[1]
7-56-716-4
Spizzirri E.
Daniel T.[6]
6-726-06-4
Mcdonald M.[4]
Svajda T.
6-36-4
R16
Cazaux A.[1]
Lestienne C.
7-56-4
Quinn E.[8]
Brooksby J.
6-35-77-65
Mcdonald M.[4]
Gigante M.
6-37-5
Majchrzak K.[5]
Mmoh M.
7-57-5
Daniel T.[6]
Rybakov A.
7-697-61
Svajda T.
Krueger M.[7]
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Nanda G.
6-46-3
Spizzirri E.
Martin A.
1-66-16-4
R32
Brooksby J.
Wong C.
6-26-4
Quinn E.[8]
Perez A.
6-47-63
Martin A.
Svajda Z.
6-43-66-3
Spizzirri E.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-1
Daniel T.[6]
Zink T.
6-46-4
Svajda T.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-37-64
Mcdonald M.[4]
Sell K.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.[5]
Smith C.
7-636-4
Mmoh M.
Bicknell B.
2-67-646-4
Nanda G.
Atmane T.
7-654-67-5
Bolt A.
Boyer T.[2]
6-37-64
Rybakov A.
Albot R.
7-626-3
Gigante M.
Murali R.
6-26-4
Krueger M.[7]
Andrade A.
6-43-66-1
Cazaux A.[1]
Tu L.
6-36-4
Lestienne C.
Dostanic S.
6-36-4