Govind Nanda vs Terence Atmane — San Diego CH Round of 32

San Diego CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Govind Nanda
#781ATP
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 February 2025
hard
Terence Atmane
FRA
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Nanda G.
7-6 4-6 7-5
Atmane T.
Nanda G.
77472
Atmane T.
65651

Govind Nanda defeated Terence Atmane 7-6 4-6 7-5 in the San Diego CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nanda G.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Atmane T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nanda G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nanda G.Atmane T.
—
Serve
37
—
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nanda G.Atmane T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.3
7.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (23 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nanda G.Atmane T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
5
56
Break points saved·Dominant
38
95
Break points won·Even
22
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
54
Tiebreaks·
—
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nanda G.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Atmane T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
3.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.5
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nanda G.Atmane T.
Freshness·
—
96

Atmane T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Spizzirri E.
Mcdonald M.[4]
6-42-66-4
Semi-finals
Spizzirri E.
Quinn E.[8]
6-34-66-3
Mcdonald M.[4]
Majchrzak K.[5]
3-66-16-1
Quarter-finals
Majchrzak K.[5]
Bolt A.
7-621-1
Quinn E.[8]
Cazaux A.[1]
7-56-716-4
Spizzirri E.
Daniel T.[6]
6-726-06-4
Mcdonald M.[4]
Svajda T.
6-36-4
R16
Cazaux A.[1]
Lestienne C.
7-56-4
Quinn E.[8]
Brooksby J.
6-35-77-65
Mcdonald M.[4]
Gigante M.
6-37-5
Majchrzak K.[5]
Mmoh M.
7-57-5
Daniel T.[6]
Rybakov A.
7-697-61
Svajda T.
Krueger M.[7]
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Nanda G.
6-46-3
Spizzirri E.
Martin A.
1-66-16-4
R32
Brooksby J.
Wong C.
6-26-4
Quinn E.[8]
Perez A.
6-47-63
Martin A.
Svajda Z.
6-43-66-3
Spizzirri E.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-1
Daniel T.[6]
Zink T.
6-46-4
Svajda T.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-37-64
Mcdonald M.[4]
Sell K.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.[5]
Smith C.
7-636-4
Mmoh M.
Bicknell B.
2-67-646-4
Nanda G.
Atmane T.
7-654-67-5
Bolt A.
Boyer T.[2]
6-37-64
Rybakov A.
Albot R.
7-626-3
Gigante M.
Murali R.
6-26-4
Krueger M.[7]
Andrade A.
6-43-66-1
Cazaux A.[1]
Tu L.
6-36-4
Lestienne C.
Dostanic S.
6-36-4