Amanda Anisimova vs Aryna Sabalenka — Toronto Quarter-final

Toronto · WTA · Quarter-final
Amanda Anisimova
USA
Amanda Anisimova
#6WTA
1914ELO
1880Hard ELO
$1.2MYTD
$14MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2024
hard
Aryna Sabalenka
BLR2
Aryna Sabalenka
#1WTA
2220ELO
2201Hard ELO
$4.7MYTD
$50MCAREER
28 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
Anisimova A.
6-4 6-2
Sabalenka A.
Anisimova A.
662
Sabalenka A.
420

Amanda Anisimova defeated Aryna Sabalenka 6-4 6-2 in the Toronto quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Aryna Sabalenka came in ranked #1, but Amanda Anisimova had arrived on a 3-match winning run. Amanda Anisimova extended the head-to-head to 6–5.

Key context

Head to head

5–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-11-01Riyadh FinalsSFhardAryna Sabalenka6-3 3-6 6-3
2025-08-25US OpenFhardAryna Sabalenka6-3 7-6(3)
2025-06-30WimbledonSFgrassAmanda Anisimova6-4 4-6 6-4
2025-05-26Roland GarrosR16clayAryna Sabalenka7-5 6-3
2024-01-15Australian OpenR16hardAryna Sabalenka6-3 6-2
2022-05-09RomeQFclayAryna Sabalenka4-6 6-3 6-2
2022-04-28MadridR64clayAmanda Anisimova6-2 3-6 6-4
2022-04-04CharlestonR16clayAmanda Anisimova3-6 6-4 6-3
2019-05-27Roland GarrosR64clayAmanda Anisimova6-4 6-2
2019-01-14Australian OpenR32hardAmanda Anisimova6-3 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Anisimova A.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Sabalenka A.

Sabalenka A.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Anisimova A.

Serve advantage — Sabalenka A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Anisimova A.Sabalenka A.
51
Serve
96
72
Return
39

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Anisimova A.Sabalenka A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.5
4.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (110 vs 165). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Anisimova A.Sabalenka A.
Clutch Rating·Even
96
98
Break points saved·Even
95
98
Break points won·Even
99
100
Deciding sets·Even
95
97
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
94
100

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Anisimova A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Sabalenka A.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.2Hard Elo 1880
Surface ELO
7.8+322 Hard Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1914
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 2220
0.0
H2H
10.0
8.2
Surface form
6.0
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
6.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Anisimova A.Sabalenka A.
Freshness·Even
87
88

Anisimova A.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Sabalenka A.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 21 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
24°COvercast
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 78%

Draw

Final
Pegula J.[3]
Anisimova A.
6-32-66-1
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[3]
Shnaider D.[14]
6-46-3
Anisimova A.
Navarro E.[8]
6-32-66-2
Quarter-finals
Shnaider D.[14]
Samsonova L.[6]
4-66-16-4
Pegula J.[3]
Stearns P.
6-47-5
Navarro E.[8]
Townsend T.
6-37-65
Anisimova A.
Sabalenka A.[2]
6-46-2
R16
Stearns P.
Azarenka V.[12]
6-44-2
Anisimova A.
Kalinskaya A.[10]
6-20-0
Pegula J.[3]
Krueger A.
6-26-4
Townsend T.
Ostapenko J.[4]
6-26-1
Navarro E.[8]
Kostyuk M.[11]
7-57-5
Shnaider D.[14]
Gauff C.[1]
6-46-1
Samsonova L.[6]
Mertens E.
6-26-4
Sabalenka A.[2]
Boulter K.
6-36-3
R32
Boulter K.
Haddad Maia B.[13]
1-1
Navarro E.[8]
Linette M.
6-26-4
Townsend T.
Stakusic M.
6-06-2
Ostapenko J.[4]
Badosa P.
3-67-636-2
Anisimova A.
Kasatkina D.[5]
6-46-3
Kostyuk M.[11]
Svitolina E.
6-22-66-2
Stearns P.
Keys M.[7]
3-67-53-0
Gauff C.[1]
Wang Y.
6-46-4
Mertens E.
Osaka N.
6-36-4
Samsonova L.[6]
Uchijima M.
6-46-2
Krueger A.
Fernandez L.[15]
6-46-2
Azarenka V.[12]
Minnen G.
3-67-56-1
Pegula J.[3]
Pliskova K.
7-56-4
Sabalenka A.[2]
Yuan Y.
6-26-2
Kalinskaya A.[10]
Tsurenko L.
6-26-2
Shnaider D.[14]
Frech M.
2-66-37-65
R64
Townsend T.
Yastremska D.[16]
6-33-1
Wang Y.
Kenin S.
7-57-63
Shnaider D.[14]
Dart H.
6-33-67-62
Badosa P.
Tauson C.
6-16-4
Kalinskaya A.[10]
Chirico L.
6-26-3
Stakusic M.
Andreeva E.
6-756-16-4
Frech M.
Potapova A.
4-66-36-0
Mertens E.
Volynets K.
6-36-1
Pliskova K.
Podoroska N.
6-47-610
Stearns P.
Blinkova A.
6-46-3
Tsurenko L.
Andreescu B.
0-66-36-4
Haddad Maia B.[13]
Bouzkova M.
5-76-27-61
Boulter K.
Pera B.
6-43-66-1
Yuan Y.
Bucsa C.
6-36-3
Osaka N.
Jabeur O.[9]
6-36-1
Azarenka V.[12]
Pavlyuchenkova A.
6-26-2
Uchijima M.
Tomova V.
7-646-2
Svitolina E.
Rogers S.
6-06-2
Krueger A.
Cocciaretto E.
6-36-2
Kostyuk M.[11]
Maria T.
6-06-2
Anisimova A.
Dolehide C.
6-16-4
Fernandez L.[15]
Hibino N.
6-35-76-1
Minnen G.
Stephens S.
6-26-2
Linette M.
Marino R.
6-36-4