Amanda Anisimova vs Aryna Sabalenka — Charleston Round of 16

Charleston · WTA · Round of 16
Amanda Anisimova
USA15
Amanda Anisimova
#6WTA
1914ELO
1751Clay ELO
$1.2MYTD
$14MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 April 2022
clay
Aryna Sabalenka
BLR1
Aryna Sabalenka
#1WTA
2220ELO
2103Clay ELO
$4.7MYTD
$50MCAREER
28 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
Anisimova A.
3-6 6-4 6-3
Sabalenka A.
Anisimova A.
3662
Sabalenka A.
6431

Amanda Anisimova defeated Aryna Sabalenka 3-6 6-4 6-3 in the Charleston round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Aryna Sabalenka came in ranked #1. Amanda Anisimova extended the head-to-head to 6–5.

Key context

Head to head

5–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-11-01Riyadh FinalsSFhardAryna Sabalenka6-3 3-6 6-3
2025-08-25US OpenFhardAryna Sabalenka6-3 7-6(3)
2025-06-30WimbledonSFgrassAmanda Anisimova6-4 4-6 6-4
2025-05-26Roland GarrosR16clayAryna Sabalenka7-5 6-3
2024-08-05TorontoQFhardAmanda Anisimova6-4 6-2
2024-01-15Australian OpenR16hardAryna Sabalenka6-3 6-2
2022-05-09RomeQFclayAryna Sabalenka4-6 6-3 6-2
2022-04-28MadridR64clayAmanda Anisimova6-2 3-6 6-4
2019-05-27Roland GarrosR64clayAmanda Anisimova6-4 6-2
2019-01-14Australian OpenR32hardAmanda Anisimova6-3 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Anisimova A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Sabalenka A.

Sabalenka A.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Anisimova A.

Serve advantage — Sabalenka A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Anisimova A.Sabalenka A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
44%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Anisimova A.Sabalenka A.
Clutch Rating·Even
96
98
Break points saved·Even
95
98
Break points won·Even
99
100
Deciding sets·Even
95
97
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
94
100

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Anisimova A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Sabalenka A.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.5Clay Elo 1751
Surface ELO
8.5+352 Clay Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1914
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 2220
10.0
H2H
0.0
4.6
Surface form
7.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Country comfort
5.5
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Anisimova A.Sabalenka A.
Freshness·Even
84
86

Anisimova A.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 26 games (7d) · Sabalenka A.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 21 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
21°CPartly cloudy
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 53%

Draw

Final
Bencic B.[10]
Jabeur O.[4]
6-15-76-4
Semi-finals
Jabeur O.[4]
Anisimova A.[15]
2-66-16-4
Bencic B.[10]
Alexandrova E.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Anisimova A.[15]
Vandeweghe C.
6-16-2
Jabeur O.[4]
Kalinina A.
6-36-2
Alexandrova E.
Linette M.
6-06-2
Bencic B.[10]
Badosa P.[2]
2-67-626-4
R16
Anisimova A.[15]
Sabalenka A.[1]
3-66-46-3
Jabeur O.[4]
Begu I.
6-36-2
Linette M.
Kanepi K.
6-34-66-2
Alexandrova E.
Pliskova K.[3]
6-36-1
Vandeweghe C.
Pegula J.[6]
6-43-66-4
Bencic B.[10]
Keys M.[9]
6-46-4
Kalinina A.
Cornet A.[12]
7-657-5
Badosa P.[2]
Liu C.
3-67-686-1
R32
Pliskova K.[3]
Zavatska K.
5-77-56-4
Liu C.
Zhang S.[16]
7-52-66-4
Sabalenka A.[1]
Riske Amritraj A.
7-636-4
Anisimova A.[15]
Putintseva Y.
6-16-2
Vandeweghe C.
Davis L.
3-66-36-3
Pegula J.[6]
Paolini J.
6-26-1
Jabeur O.[4]
Navarro E.
6-36-2
Begu I.
Tomljanovic A.[14]
6-26-3
Cornet A.[12]
Baptiste H.
6-36-2
Kalinina A.
Rybakina E.[5]
6-42-66-4
Linette M.
Fernandez L.[7]
3-66-36-4
Bencic B.[10]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-17-66
Badosa P.[2]
Bondar A.
6-16-4
Alexandrova E.
Zheng Q.
2-67-55-2
Kanepi K.
Frech M.
7-56-3
Keys M.[9]
Eikeri U.
6-36-1
R64
Riske Amritraj A.
Mcnally C.
7-56-3
Putintseva Y.
Anderson R.
6-27-69
Paolini J.
Lee G.
6-26-3
Cornet A.[12]
Parks A.
6-07-5
Navarro E.
Brengle M.
6-746-23-0
Kalinina A.
Sasnovich A.
6-46-4
Zheng Q.
Stephens S.[13]
6-34-66-0
Alexandrova E.
Kiick A.
6-16-1
Fruhvirtova L.
Konjuh A.
4-66-16-3
Frech M.
Kvitova P.[11]
7-663-2
Zhang S.[16]
Di Lorenzo F.
6-26-4
Vandeweghe C.
Gasanova A.
6-34-66-3
Anisimova A.[15]
Vickery S.
6-07-5
Linette M.
Volynets K.
4-66-37-64
Tomljanovic A.[14]
Chang S.
7-56-4
Bencic B.[10]
Wang X.
4-67-656-3
Zavatska K.
Yuan Y.
6-46-2
Begu I.
Wang X.
7-626-4
Kanepi K.
Rogers S.
6-727-56-2
Liu C.
Watson H.
6-46-2
Davis L.
Bolkvadze M.
6-26-3
Bondar A.
Hartono A.
6-16-4
Eikeri U.
Kichenok N.
5-76-26-2
Baptiste H.
Ruse E.
6-36-0