Jessica Pegula vs Coco Gauff — Berlin Semi-final

Berlin · WTA · Semi-final
Jessica Pegula
USA3
Jessica Pegula
#4WTA
2097ELO
1903Grass ELO
$2.8MYTD
$25MCAREER
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2024
grass
Coco Gauff
USA5
Coco Gauff
#7WTA
2071ELO
1823Grass ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
Pegula J.
7-5 7-6
Gauff C.
Pegula J.
7772
Gauff C.
5620

Jessica Pegula defeated Coco Gauff 7-5 7-6 in the Berlin semi-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Jessica Pegula came in ranked #4. Jessica Pegula extended the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

Head to head

4–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-07-07WimbledonQFgrassCoco Gauff6-4 3-6 3-6
2025-11-01Riyadh FinalsRRhardJessica Pegula6-3 6-7(4) 6-2
2025-10-06WuhanFhardCoco Gauff6-4 7-5
2024-11-04Riyadh FinalsRRhardCoco Gauff6-3 6-2
2023-10-30Cancun FinalsSFhardJessica Pegula6-2 6-1
2023-08-07MontrealQFhardJessica Pegula6-2 5-7 7-5
2023-06-26EastbourneQFgrassCoco Gauff6-3 6-3
2022-02-14DubaiR32hardJessica Pegula6-4 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Pegula J.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Gauff C.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Pegula J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pegula J.Gauff C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
43%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
45%
49%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
6.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (151 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pegula J.Gauff C.
Clutch Rating·Even
96
99
Break points saved·Even
96
96
Break points won·Even
99
100
Deciding sets·Even
100
100
Tiebreaks·Even
96
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pegula J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Gauff C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.4+81 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Grass Elo 1823
5.2Overall Elo 2097
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 2071
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.8
Surface form
5.6
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Pegula J.Gauff C.
Freshness·Clear edge
72
54

Pegula J.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 54 games (7d) · Gauff C.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
20°CDrizzle
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 63%

Draw

Final
Pegula J.[3]
Kalinskaya A.
6-706-47-63
Semi-finals
Kalinskaya A.
Azarenka V.
6-16-736-1
Pegula J.[3]
Gauff C.[5]
7-57-62
Quarter-finals
Kalinskaya A.
Sabalenka A.[1]
5-1
Azarenka V.
Rybakina E.[2]
3-1
Gauff C.[5]
Jabeur O.[8]
7-690-0
Pegula J.[3]
Siniakova K.
7-623-66-3
R16
Kalinskaya A.
Vondrousova M.[5]
5-5
Gauff C.[5]
Alexandrova E.
7-666-2
Pegula J.[3]
Vekic D.
6-47-5
Sabalenka A.[1]
Kasatkina D.
6-16-4
Rybakina E.[2]
Kudermetova V.
6-47-5
Jabeur O.[8]
Noskova L.[8]
6-756-36-4
Siniakova K.
Zheng Q.[6]
6-46-4
Azarenka V.
Sonmez Z.
6-36-3
R32
Kasatkina D.
Kostyuk M.
4-67-666-3
Kalinskaya A.
Hibino N.
2-66-46-2
Noskova L.[8]
Kerber A.
7-642-66-4
Alexandrova E.
Haddad Maia B.
6-46-4
Siniakova K.
Navarro E.
6-46-3
Kudermetova V.
Samsonova L.
3-66-46-4
Vondrousova M.[5]
Masarova R.
6-46-3
Jabeur O.[8]
Wang X.
6-47-64
Vekic D.
Niemeier J.
1-66-16-3
Azarenka V.
Sakkari M.[7]
6-46-2
Zheng Q.[6]
Osaka N.
6-43-66-3
Sonmez Z.
Rus A.
3-66-26-1