Jessica Pegula vs Coco Gauff — Montreal Quarter-final

Montreal · WTA · Quarter-final
Jessica Pegula
USA4
Jessica Pegula
#4WTA
2097ELO
2058Hard ELO
$2.8MYTD
$25MCAREER
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
hard
Coco Gauff
USA6
Coco Gauff
#7WTA
2071ELO
2035Hard ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
Pegula J.
6-2 5-7 7-5
Gauff C.
Pegula J.
6572
Gauff C.
2751

Jessica Pegula defeated Coco Gauff 6-2 5-7 7-5 in the Montreal quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jessica Pegula came in ranked #4. Jessica Pegula extended the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

  • Match story: Jessica Pegula closed it out in three sets, 6–2 5–7 7–5.

Head to head

4–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-07-07WimbledonQFgrassCoco Gauff6-4 3-6 3-6
2025-11-01Riyadh FinalsRRhardJessica Pegula6-3 6-7(4) 6-2
2025-10-06WuhanFhardCoco Gauff6-4 7-5
2024-11-04Riyadh FinalsRRhardCoco Gauff6-3 6-2
2024-06-17BerlinSFgrassJessica Pegula7-5 7-6(2)
2023-10-30Cancun FinalsSFhardJessica Pegula6-2 6-1
2023-06-26EastbourneQFgrassCoco Gauff6-3 6-3
2022-02-14DubaiR32hardJessica Pegula6-4 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Pegula J.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Gauff C.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Pegula J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Pegula J.Gauff C.
68
Serve
25
73
Return
100

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Pegula J.Gauff C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
44%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
45%
48%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
5.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pegula J.Gauff C.
Clutch Rating·Even
96
99
Break points saved·Even
96
96
Break points won·Even
99
100
Deciding sets·Even
100
100
Tiebreaks·Even
96
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pegula J.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Gauff C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+23 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Hard Elo 2035
5.2Overall Elo 2097
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 2071
10.0
H2H
0.0
7.8
Surface form
8.6
0.0
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
6.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Pegula J.Gauff C.
Freshness·Clear edge
72
54

Pegula J.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 54 games (7d) · Gauff C.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
22°COvercast
Wind 15 km/hHumidity 68%

Draw

Final
Pegula J.[4]
Samsonova L.[15]
6-16-0
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[4]
Swiatek I.[1]
6-26-746-4
Samsonova L.[15]
Rybakina E.[3]
1-66-16-2
Quarter-finals
Pegula J.[4]
Gauff C.[6]
6-25-77-5
Rybakina E.[3]
Kasatkina D.[10]
5-77-57-68
Samsonova L.[15]
Bencic B.[12]
6-46-4
Swiatek I.[1]
Collins D.
6-34-66-2
R16
Swiatek I.[1]
Muchova K.[14]
6-14-66-4
Gauff C.[6]
Vondrousova M.[9]
6-36-0
Rybakina E.[3]
Stephens S.
6-36-3
Bencic B.[12]
Kvitova P.[7]
6-736-36-1
Kasatkina D.[10]
Bouzkova M.
6-36-4
Samsonova L.[15]
Sabalenka A.[2]
7-624-66-3
Collins D.
Fernandez L.
6-26-3
Pegula J.[4]
Paolini J.
6-46-0
R32
Muchova K.[14]
Cirstea S.
7-56-4
Pegula J.[4]
Putintseva Y.
6-46-4
Paolini J.
Keys M.[13]
W/O
Stephens S.
Azarenka V.[16]
W/O
Gauff C.[6]
Boulter K.
6-26-2
Rybakina E.[3]
Brady J.
6-737-656-3
Bencic B.[12]
Parks A.
6-35-76-4
Sabalenka A.[2]
Martic P.
6-37-65
Samsonova L.[15]
Zheng Q.
6-36-2
Vondrousova M.[9]
Wozniacki C.
6-27-5
Kvitova P.[7]
Giorgi C.
6-25-76-0
Fernandez L.
Haddad Maia B.[11]
7-55-76-3
Collins D.
Sakkari M.[8]
6-46-2
Kasatkina D.[10]
Blinkova A.
6-27-5
Swiatek I.[1]
Pliskova K.
7-666-2
Bouzkova M.
Garcia C.[5]
6-44-66-2
R64
Paolini J.
Vekic D.
7-636-2
Zheng Q.
Kostyuk M.
6-21-66-3
Samsonova L.[15]
Siniakova K.
4-66-26-3
Muchova K.[14]
Potapova A.
7-646-2
Pliskova K.
Zhu L.
6-36-786-2
Haddad Maia B.[11]
Frech M.
6-46-2
Fernandez L.
Stearns P.
6-36-2
Collins D.
Svitolina E.
6-26-2
Putintseva Y.
Pera B.
6-36-4
Keys M.[13]
Williams V.
6-27-5
Vondrousova M.[9]
Sherif M.
6-46-2
Boulter K.
Marino R.
6-36-1
Bouzkova M.
Day K.
7-616-3
Kasatkina D.[10]
Mertens E.
6-46-2
Azarenka V.[16]
Linette M.
6-36-0
Stephens S.
Kalinina A.
6-47-62
Brady J.
Ostapenko J.
7-670-67-68
Giorgi C.
Andreescu B.
6-36-2
Bencic B.[12]
Bronzetti L.
6-26-3
Wozniacki C.
Birrell K.
6-26-2
Parks A.
Davis L.
7-54-66-2
Martic P.
Bucsa C.
6-06-4
Cirstea S.
Gracheva V.
6-47-63
Blinkova A.
Zhang S.
4-66-26-3