Tommy Paul vs Jack Draper — Queen's Club Quarter-final

Queen's Club · ATP · Quarter-final
Tommy Paul
USA5
Tommy Paul
#25ATP
1949ELO
1801Grass ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 June 2024
grass
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#131ATP
1822ELO
1704Grass ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Paul T.
6-3 5-7 6-4
Draper J.
Paul T.
6562
Draper J.
3741

Tommy Paul defeated Jack Draper 6-3 5-7 6-4 in the Queen's Club quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Tommy Paul came in ranked #25, defending last year's round of 32. Tommy Paul narrowed the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Tommy Paul closed it out in three sets, 6–3 5–7 6–4.

Head to head

1–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-04-23Madrid MastersR16clayJack Draper6-2 6-2
2024-02-26AcapulcoR32hardJack Draper6-0 6-4
2024-01-15Australian OpenR64hardTommy Paul6-2 3-6 6-3 7-5
2024-01-08AdelaideQFhardJack Draper6-1 6-4
2023-01-09Adelaide 2R16hardJack Draper6-4 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Draper J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Draper J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
67%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
8.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 107). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Draper J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
93
88
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Even
87
83
Deciding sets·Even
98
96
Tiebreaks·Even
96
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Paul T.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Draper J.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.3+97 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Grass Elo 1704
5.3Overall Elo 1949
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1822
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
8.5
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
4.7
7.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Country comfort
6.2
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Draper J.
Freshness·Clear edge
86
100

Paul T.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Draper J.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
19°CMainly clear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 48%
Final
Paul T.[5]
Musetti L.
6-17-68
Semi-finals
Paul T.[5]
Korda S.
6-47-62
Musetti L.
Thompson J.
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.
Fritz T.[4]
6-46-3
Musetti L.
Harris B.
6-37-5
Paul T.[5]
Draper J.
6-35-76-4
Korda S.
Hijikata R.
6-746-36-4
R16
Thompson J.
Murray A.
4-1
Draper J.
Alcaraz C.[1]
7-636-3
Paul T.[5]
Tabilo A.
6-36-4
Hijikata R.
Arnaldi M.
7-607-67
Harris B.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-47-5
Korda S.
Dimitrov G.[3]
6-43-67-5
Fritz T.[4]
Raonic M.
7-656-4
Musetti L.
Nakashima B.
6-44-66-4
R32
Draper J.
Navone M.
6-36-2
Paul T.[5]
Baez S.
6-46-4
Dimitrov G.[3]
Mannarino A.
6-16-2
Nakashima B.
Evans D.
4-66-30-0
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Shelton B.[6]
6-37-63
Harris B.
Etcheverry T.
6-43-66-3
Thompson J.
Rune H.[7]
4-67-646-3
Hijikata R.
Tiafoe F.
7-54-61-0
Murray A.
Popyrin A.
6-33-66-3
Alcaraz C.[1]
Cerundolo F.
6-17-5
Korda S.
Khachanov K.
7-57-65
Arnaldi M.
Humbert U.[8]
3-66-17-66
Raonic M.
Norrie C.
6-766-37-69
Fritz T.[4]
Daniel T.
6-36-3
Tabilo A.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-663-66-1
Musetti L.
De Minaur A.[2]
1-66-46-2