Alex De Minaur vs Holger Rune — Queen's Club Semi-final

Queen's Club · ATP · Semi-final
Alex De Minaur
AUS7
Alex De Minaur
#6ATP
1961ELO
1834Grass ELO
$2.4MYTD
$25MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
Holger Rune
DEN2
Holger Rune
#77ATP
1757ELO
1628Grass ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
De Minaur A.
6-3 7-6
Rune H.
De Minaur A.
6772
Rune H.
3620

Alex De Minaur defeated Holger Rune 6-3 7-6 in the Queen's Club semi-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Alex De Minaur came in ranked #6, defending last year's round of 16. Alex De Minaur narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-10-28Paris MastersQFhardHolger Rune6-4 4-6 7-5
2023-02-27AcapulcoSFhardAlex De Minaur3-6 7-5 6-2
2022-10-24BaselR32hardHolger Rune6-2 7-5
2022-10-17StockholmSFhardHolger Rune4-6 7-6(1) 7-5
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
De Minaur A.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Rune H.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs De Minaur A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
De Minaur A.Rune H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
5.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Minaur A.Rune H.
Clutch Rating·Even
95
91
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Clear edge
97
84
Deciding sets·Even
97
98
Tiebreaks·Even
99
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Minaur A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Rune H.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.3+205 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Grass Elo 1628
7.5Overall Elo 1961
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1757
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
2.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0
2.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Minaur A.Rune H.
Freshness·
77
—

De Minaur A.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
22°CDrizzle
Wind 22 km/hHumidity 60%
Final
Alcaraz C.[1]
De Minaur A.[7]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Alcaraz C.[1]
Korda S.
6-36-4
De Minaur A.[7]
Rune H.[2]
6-37-62
Quarter-finals
Korda S.
Norrie C.[5]
6-47-61
De Minaur A.[7]
Mannarino A.
6-44-66-4
Rune H.[2]
Musetti L.[6]
6-47-5
Alcaraz C.[1]
Dimitrov G.
6-46-4
R16
Dimitrov G.
Cerundolo F.[8]
6-37-5
Korda S.
Tiafoe F.[4]
7-626-3
Norrie C.[5]
Thompson J.
4-66-36-2
De Minaur A.[7]
Schwartzman D.
6-26-2
Mannarino A.
Fritz T.[3]
6-47-67
Musetti L.[6]
Shelton B.
6-44-66-4
Rune H.[2]
Peniston R.
6-36-4
Alcaraz C.[1]
Lehecka J.
6-26-3
R32
Rune H.[2]
Cressy M.
7-647-63
Dimitrov G.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-4
Cerundolo F.[8]
Paul T.
7-624-66-4
Korda S.
Evans D.
6-47-5
Schwartzman D.
Mcdonald M.
6-26-4
Mannarino A.
Broady L.
1-66-46-3
Shelton B.
Wolf J.
7-647-62
Thompson J.
Popyrin A.
6-46-4
Alcaraz C.[1]
Rinderknech A.
4-67-57-63
Lehecka J.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-646-3
Fritz T.[3]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-47-5
Peniston R.
Humbert U.
6-46-2
De Minaur A.[7]
Murray A.
6-36-1
Tiafoe F.[4]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-26-4
Norrie C.[5]
Kecmanovic M.
6-47-65
Musetti L.[6]
Choinski J.
6-46-2