Alexander Bublik vs Frances Tiafoe — Eastbourne Round of 32

Eastbourne · ATP · Round of 32
Alexander Bublik
KAZ
Alexander Bublik
#11ATP
1889ELO
1802Grass ELO
$1.2MYTD
$12MCAREER
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 June 2022
grass
Frances Tiafoe
USA7
Frances Tiafoe
#19ATP
1918ELO
1823Grass ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
Bublik A.
5-7 7-6 6-0
Tiafoe F.
Bublik A.
57762
Tiafoe F.
76401

Alexander Bublik defeated Frances Tiafoe 5-7 7-6 6-0 in the Eastbourne round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Alexander Bublik came in ranked #11, defending last year's quarter-final. Alexander Bublik extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-07-04WimbledonR32grassAlexander Bublik6-4 6.5-7.7 6.11-7.13 6-4 3-6
2023-10-30Paris MastersR64hardAlexander Bublik6-3 6-4
2022-06-27WimbledonR32grassFrances Tiafoe3-6 7-6(1) 7-6(3) 6-4
2019-07-29WashingtonR32hardFrances Tiafoe6-1 7-6(5)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Bublik A.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Tiafoe F.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Bublik A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bublik A.Tiafoe F.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
75%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
8.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bublik A.Tiafoe F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
88
83
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Slight edge
67
57
Deciding sets·Slight edge
99
92
Tiebreaks·Even
96
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bublik A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Tiafoe F.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1Grass Elo 1802
Surface ELO
3.9+21 Grass Elo edge
5.5Overall Elo 1889
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1918
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
5.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
8.3
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bublik A.Tiafoe F.
Freshness·Slight edge
66
72

Bublik A.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 88 games (7d) · Tiafoe F.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 55 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fritz T.[3]
Cressy M.
6-26-747-64
Semi-finals
Fritz T.[3]
De Minaur A.[6]
6-16-756-3
Cressy M.
Draper J.
7-656-726-3
Quarter-finals
Cressy M.
Norrie C.[1]
7-57-5
De Minaur A.[6]
Paul T.
6-24-66-4
Draper J.
Peniston R.
6-36-3
Fritz T.[3]
Bublik A.
6-36-2
R16
Norrie C.[1]
Nakashima B.
6-46-2
Bublik A.
Millman J.
6-46-2
De Minaur A.[6]
Sonego L.
7-636-2
Paul T.
Sinner J.[2]
6-33-66-3
Fritz T.[3]
Monteiro T.
7-56-3
Cressy M.
Evans D.
7-626-4
Peniston R.
Martinez P.
7-683-66-3
Draper J.
Schwartzman D.[4]
7-57-63
R32
Martinez P.
Davidovich Fokina A.
1-67-660-0
Nakashima B.
Clarke J.
6-16-3
Peniston R.
Rune H.[8]
4-67-656-1
Monteiro T.
Humbert U.
6-726-36-4
Paul T.
Cerundolo F.
4-67-626-4
Sonego L.
Duckworth J.
4-67-657-61
De Minaur A.[6]
Garin C.
6-36-3
Bublik A.
Tiafoe F.[7]
5-77-646-0
Evans D.
Mannarino A.
6-46-3
Millman J.
Korda S.
6-37-65
Draper J.
Brooksby J.
6-26-2
Cressy M.
Opelka R.[5]
6-36-1