Jannik Sinner vs Andrey Rublev — Monte Carlo Masters Round of 16

Monte Carlo Masters · ATP · Round of 16
Jannik Sinner
ITA9
Jannik Sinner
#1ATP
2320ELO
2216Clay ELO
$6.9MYTD
$65MCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
Andrey Rublev
RUS5
Andrey Rublev
#13ATP
1902ELO
1872Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Sinner J.
5-7 6-1 6-3
Rublev A.
Sinner J.
5662
Rublev A.
7131

Jannik Sinner defeated Andrey Rublev 5-7 6-1 6-3 in the Monte Carlo Masters round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jannik Sinner came in ranked #1, leading the head-to-head 7–3, defending last year's round of 32. Jannik Sinner extended the head-to-head to 8–3.

Key context

Head to head

7–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-14Rome MastersQFclayJannik Sinner6-2 6-4
2025-05-26Roland GarrosR16clayJannik Sinner6-1 6-3 6-4
2024-08-12Cincinnati MastersQFhardJannik Sinner4-6 7-5 6-4
2024-08-05Canada MastersQFhardAndrey Rublev6-3 1-6 6-2
2024-01-15Australian OpenQFhardJannik Sinner6-4 7-6(5) 6-3
2023-10-23ViennaSFhardJannik Sinner7-5 7-6(5)
2023-03-20Miami MastersR16hardJannik Sinner6-2 6-4
2022-05-23Roland GarrosR16clayAndrey Rublev1-6 6-4 2-0 RET
2021-04-19BarcelonaQFclayJannik Sinner6-2 7-6(6)
2020-10-26ViennaR16hardAndrey Rublev2-1 RET
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Sinner J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Sinner J.

Serve advantage — Sinner J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Sinner J.Rublev A.
99
Serve
14
91
Return
62

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Sinner J.Rublev A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
79%
76%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
58%
52%
Service points won·Even
71%
67%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
74%
66%
Aces / match·Even
7.4
7.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sinner J.Rublev A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
100
89
Break points saved·Even
100
100
Break points won·Dominant
100
72
Deciding sets·Even
100
97
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
100
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sinner J.
8.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Rublev A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.7+343 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.3Clay Elo 1872
10.0Overall Elo 2320
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1902
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.1
Surface form
5.5
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sinner J.Rublev A.
Freshness·Dominant
53
93

Sinner J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 95 games (7d) · Rublev A.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
16°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 40%
Final
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Davidovich Fokina A.
Dimitrov G.
6-46-726-3
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Zverev A.[2]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Davidovich Fokina A.
Fritz T.[10]
2-66-46-3
Dimitrov G.
Hurkacz H.[11]
6-43-67-62
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Schwartzman D.[12]
6-26-736-4
Zverev A.[2]
Sinner J.[9]
5-76-37-65
R16
Schwartzman D.[12]
Musetti L.
2-66-46-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Goffin D.
6-46-1
Fritz T.[10]
Korda S.
7-647-5
Dimitrov G.
Ruud C.[4]
6-37-5
Hurkacz H.[11]
Ramos A.
7-626-2
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Djere L.
7-57-61
Sinner J.[9]
Rublev A.[5]
5-76-16-3
Zverev A.[2]
Carreno Busta P.[13]
6-27-5
R32
Dimitrov G.
Lajovic D.
4-66-36-2
Carreno Busta P.[13]
Bublik A.
4-67-634-3
Fritz T.[10]
Cilic M.
6-34-66-4
Korda S.
Alcaraz C.[8]
7-626-756-3
Ruud C.[4]
Rune H.
7-657-5
Hurkacz H.[11]
Martinez P.
6-34-66-4
Ramos A.
Norrie C.[7]
6-42-66-4
Musetti L.
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
6-27-62
Schwartzman D.[12]
Fucsovics M.
6-07-64
Djere L.
Sonego L.[16]
6-46-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Djokovic N.[1]
6-36-756-1
Goffin D.
Evans D.
7-656-2
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Fognini F.
6-36-0
Rublev A.[5]
De Minaur A.
2-66-16-4
Sinner J.[9]
Ruusuvuori E.
7-56-3
Zverev A.[2]
Delbonis F.
6-17-5
R64
Dimitrov G.
Basilashvili N.[15]
6-32-0
Ruusuvuori E.
Otte O.
6-46-3
Sinner J.[9]
Coric B.
6-32-66-3
Carreno Busta P.[13]
Baez S.
6-44-66-2
Bublik A.
Wawrinka S.
3-67-56-2
Delbonis F.
Munar J.
6-43-66-4
Fucsovics M.
Harris L.
6-46-756-1
Martinez P.
Humbert U.
6-47-65
Davidovich Fokina A.
Giron M.
7-56-3
Goffin D.
Lehecka J.
6-46-3
Evans D.
Bonzi B.
6-07-64
Fritz T.[10]
Catarina L.
6-767-656-4
Cilic M.
Tsonga J.
6-26-2
Korda S.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-56-4
Rune H.
Karatsev A.
7-614-66-3
Lajovic D.
Krajinovic F.
6-27-64
Hurkacz H.[11]
Dellien H.
7-56-4
Ramos A.
Griekspoor T.
6-44-66-2
Musetti L.
Paire B.
6-26-746-2
Schwartzman D.[12]
Khachanov K.
6-756-36-3
Sonego L.[16]
Ivashka I.
6-36-3
Djere L.
Cressy M.
6-46-776-2
Fognini F.
Rinderknech A.
7-54-66-3
De Minaur A.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-4