Daniel Elahi Galan vs Jason Kubler — Sarasota CH Round of 16

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL5
Daniel Elahi Galan
#304ATP
1531ELO
1492Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
AUS
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1616Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
Galan D.
6-3 4-6 6-3
Kubler J.
Galan D.
6462
Kubler J.
3631

Daniel Elahi Galan defeated Jason Kubler 6-3 4-6 6-3 in the Sarasota CH round of 16 on clay. Daniel Elahi Galan extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-01-15Australian OpenR128hardDaniel Elahi Galan2-6 6-3 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(8)
2023-04-03HoustonR16clayJason Kubler6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Galan D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Kubler J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Galan D.Kubler J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.3
6.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Galan D.Kubler J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
48
59
Break points saved·Even
92
90
Break points won·Dominant
21
46
Deciding sets·Clear edge
55
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Galan D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Kubler J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
3.4Clay Elo 1492
Surface ELO
6.6+124 Clay Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1531
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1685
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Galan D.[5]
Johnson S.[4]
7-674-66-1
Semi-finals
Galan D.[5]
Tabilo A.[3]
7-636-1
Johnson S.[4]
Kudla D.[1]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Galan D.[5]
Andreev A.
2-0
Tabilo A.[3]
Wolf J.
6-16-4
Johnson S.[4]
Krueger M.
7-643-66-3
Kudla D.[1]
Sock J.[7]
7-56-1
R16
Kudla D.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-21-66-3
Tabilo A.[3]
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Andreev A.
Wu T.
6-41-67-64
Sock J.[7]
Brouwer G.
6-16-2
Wolf J.
Galarneau A.
6-16-2
Galan D.[5]
Kubler J.
6-34-66-3
Krueger M.
Barrios Vera T.[8]
6-47-63
Johnson S.[4]
Watanuki Y.
3-66-46-1
R32
Mmoh M.
Harris A.
6-36-3
Watanuki Y.
Jung J.
6-26-2
Barrios Vera T.[8]
Nanda G.
6-26-1
Galan D.[5]
Purcell M.
7-57-64
Kubler J.
Nagal S.
4-66-26-3
Tabilo A.[3]
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
Ritschard A.
Sandgren T.
7-56-3
Sock J.[7]
Harrison C.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-46-2
Brouwer G.
Torpegaard M.
6-746-46-1
Andreev A.
Harrison R.
3-66-22-0
Galarneau A.
Londero J.[6]
6-31-0
Wu T.
Hijikata R.
7-643-66-4
Wolf J.
Kovacevic A.
6-26-786-3
Krueger M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-36-2
Johnson S.[4]
Collarini A.
6-36-4